Technology

Artificial intelligence already supports a wide range of applications, from medical diagnostics and financial systems to logistics, manufacturing, defence and public service delivery. Now, it is starting to move closer to public office.

In January 2025, Albania introduced Diella, an AI-powered virtual assistant developed by the National Agency for Information Society, known as AKSHI, with support from Microsoft. Launched on the e-Albania platform, the government’s digital services portal, Diella helps citizens and businesses access official documents and services through voice assistance. She can also issue electronically stamped documents, which helps speed up administrative processes.

Then, in September 2025, Prime Minister Edi Rama announced that Diella would join his cabinet as the “Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence”. This move drew global attention. It also raised a simple question: what does it actually mean for a government to appoint an AI minister?  

The case raises bigger questions for governments everywhere. Can an AI minister make public services faster and cleaner? Or does it create new risks around transparency, accountability and control?

‍

Who is Diella, Albania’s AI minister?

Diella is not a humanoid robot sitting in a cabinet room. On screen, she appears as a digitally rendered woman wearing traditional-style Albanian clothing. Her name means “sun” in Albanian, a deliberate choice for a system meant to bring more light into public administration.  

Her face and voice have become part of the controversy. Albanian actor Anila Bisha has said she agreed for her likeness to be used for the e-Albania public services platform, but not for a cabinet-level political role. In 2026, she took legal action to stop the government from using her image and voice for Diella. For now, the government has denied wrongdoing.

‍

What does Diella actually do?

Diella began as a digital assistant on e-Albania. In that role, she helps users find services, request documents and navigate government processes online. For citizens, that can make public services feel less confusing. Businesses may also spend less time dealing with paperwork.

Her cabinet role is more political. The government wants Diella to support public procurement, where companies compete for government contracts. This is one of the most important areas of public spending. It is also one of the easiest places for corruption, favouritism and hidden influence to enter. The goal is to use AI to process information, check documents, support tender procedures and make the system more traceable.  

That said, the government has emphasized that Diella is not replacing elected officials or civil servants. As per Enio Kaso, director of AI at AKSHI, each stage will be monitored and approved by human experts.

In May 2026, the Albanian government said it had completed the technical groundwork for the AI-powered public procurement system under the Diella project. The planned system would pull data from more than 40 digital public registries, reduce paperwork for businesses and support parts of the tender process. Earlier reports said the government hoped to have the full system ready by the end of 2026.

‍

Why Albania wants AI in public procurement

The government’s case for Diella is built around anti-corruption reform. Rama has said the goal is to “wipe out every potential influence on public biddings” and thus make public tenders “100% free of corruption”. That is a bold promise, especially in a country where procurement scandals have long damaged public confidence and complicated Albania’s path toward European Union membership.  

At first glance, the logic is easy to understand. AI does not ask for bribes or favour a cousin—a big problem in the country, according to Rama—a friend or a political ally. It can apply the same rules across a large number of applications. Moreover, it can also leave a digital trail, which should make later review easier.

Some anti-corruption and governance experts see real potential in that approach. Dr. Andi Hoxhaj of King’s College London has said that if used well and programmed properly, AI could help procurement officials spot missing documents, check whether companies meet eligibility requirements and flag unusual patterns in bids. In practice, that could make the process more consistent and make it harder for individual officials to quietly bend rules.

‍

The risks behind AI in government

Diella’s appeal is speed and consistency. Her weakness is dependence.  

Like any AI system, Diella relies on the quality of the data, rules and models behind her. Erjon Curraj, an expert in digital transformation and cybersecurity, has warned that incomplete, outdated or biased data can lead to flawed results. Poor design could also cause the system to reject a valid supplier, miss signs of collusion or treat similar cases differently for reasons that are hard to explain.

In public procurement, those mistakes can have serious consequences. A wrongly flagged company could lose a major contract, and a corrupt bidder could slip through. Government agencies could hide behind the AI and say the system made the recommendation.

That leads to the biggest question: who is accountable when something goes wrong?

The answer cannot be “the AI” because Diella cannot resign. She cannot face voters. Nor can she be cross-examined in any meaningful human sense. Accountability has to sit with ministers, agencies, auditors and courts.

There is also the issue of transparency. If Diella is helping screen tenders, businesses need to know what criteria are being used. They also need a way to challenge incorrect decisions. Citizens should be told whether the AI is making recommendations or merely organizing information. Independent auditors need access to logs, data sources and decision pathways.

Without those safeguards, AI in government can become a black box. It may look modern from the outside, while making power harder to question.

‍

Diella, politics and public trust

Diella has also become a political symbol. Supporters see her as proof that a small country can move quickly and experiment with new forms of digital government. Critics see her as a distraction from deeper problems in Albania’s institutions.

Both readings can be true at the same time: Diella may help modernize public services, but she may also be used to project reform while older problems continue in the background.

That tension became clearer after the recent procurement investigations involving senior officials since Diella’s appointment. Deputy Prime Minister Belinda Balluku has been accused by prosecutors of alleged misconduct linked to infrastructure tenders, which she denies. Senior figures at AKSHI, the agency behind Diella and e-Albania, have also been placed under house arrest as part of a separate public procurement investigation.  

While these developments do not automatically discredit Diella, they may strengthen the argument for better digital oversight. More importantly, they also show that technology cannot carry the whole burden of reform.

If the institutions around an AI system are weak, the AI will not magically make them strong. Unclear procurement rules will still cause problems, and the process will still be compromised when political pressure shapes the data, the model or the final decision.

After all, AI can support integrity; it cannot replace it.

‍

Finding the right balance for AI in government

While Diella is already a public symbol of AI in government, her most important procurement role is still taking shape. This makes Albania’s experiment both ambitious and unfinished.

The more realistic model is simple: let AI handle repetitive, data-heavy administrative work. Let humans retain authority where judgment, context and public accountability matter.  

That means AI can help draft tender criteria, check documents, summarise bids and flag risks. Human officials should still make final decisions, explain those decisions and take responsibility for them. Meanwhile, independent bodies should be able to audit the process, and businesses should have a clear appeal route when they believe the system has made a mistake.

Diella once said she felt “hurt” while responding in parliament to claims that her role was unconstitutional. While this made for a memorable moment, it is important to remember simulated emotion is not consciousness, speed is not wisdom, and pattern recognition is not moral judgment.

Albania’s AI minister is therefore neither a triumph nor a failure at this stage. She is a live test case. Other governments will be watching closely, especially as public services become more digital and more automated.

The lesson is not that AI should stay out of government, but that AI must enter government carefully. The technology needs clear limits, public oversight and human accountability.

Diella may help Albania build a faster and cleaner procurement system—or she may become a warning about giving too much symbolic power to systems people do not fully understand. The final judgment will not come from the title “AI minister”. It will come from what the system does, who controls it and whether citizens can trust the results.

As AI companies continue scaling larger models and data centers, the pressure is no longer falling only on chip design. Manufacturing capacity, advanced packaging and infrastructure deployment are becoming equally important parts of the AI race. AMD’s latest investment announcement reflects how quickly that shift is accelerating.

The US chipmaker announced plans to invest more than US$10 billion across Taiwan’s semiconductor and manufacturing ecosystem to support next-generation AI infrastructure. The investment focuses on expanding partnerships and increasing advanced packaging capacity needed for future AI systems.

The announcement highlights a growing reality across the AI industry. Building powerful AI chips is no longer enough on its own. Companies now also need the manufacturing networks, packaging technologies and supply chain coordination required to deploy AI infrastructure at global scale.

AMD’s investments center heavily around advanced chip packaging, an area becoming increasingly critical as AI systems demand higher performance and greater power efficiency. Traditional chip architectures are struggling to keep pace with the size and complexity of modern AI workloads. Advanced packaging helps connect processors, memory and computing systems more efficiently while managing power and cooling limitations inside large-scale AI environments.

The company said it is working with Taiwan-based partners including ASE, SPIL and PTI to develop next-generation packaging technologies for its upcoming 6th Gen AMD EPYC processors, codenamed “Venice.” AMD also said it had qualified what it described as the industry’s first 2.5D panel-based EFB interconnect technology alongside PTI.

At the center of the broader strategy is AMD Helios, the company’s rack-scale AI infrastructure platform scheduled for deployment beginning in the second half of 2026. The platform combines AMD Instinct MI450X GPUs, 6th Gen EPYC CPUs, networking systems and AMD’s ROCm software stack into integrated AI infrastructure systems designed for hyperscale deployment.

Rather than selling individual processors alone, companies are increasingly building complete AI infrastructure platforms that combine hardware, software, cooling systems and power management into unified deployments. That transition is reshaping how AI infrastructure is designed, manufactured and delivered.

Taiwan is also becoming more deeply embedded in that process. AMD’s investment spans not only semiconductor packaging companies but also manufacturing and system integration partners including Sanmina, Wiwynn, Wistron and Inventec. The partnerships reflect Taiwan’s growing role as one of the operational centers of the global AI infrastructure economy.

Dr. Lisa Su, Chair and CEO of AMD, said: “As AI adoption accelerates, our global customers are rapidly scaling AI infrastructure to meet growing compute demand. By combining AMD leadership in high-performance computing with the Taiwan ecosystem and our strategic global partners, we are enabling integrated, rack-scale AI infrastructure that helps customers accelerate deployment of next-generation AI systems”.

Power efficiency is becoming another major challenge shaping AI infrastructure decisions. As AI workloads consume more electricity and generate more heat, infrastructure providers are increasingly being forced to rethink cooling systems, interconnect technologies and deployment economics.

AMD’s announcement signals how the AI competition is evolving beyond model development and raw computing power. The next stage may depend just as heavily on who can manufacture, package and deploy AI infrastructure fast enough to support global demand.

As AI companies build larger models and deploy more AI agents, the industry is running into a new constraint: electricity. The challenge is no longer just about computing power. It is increasingly about how to supply, manage and sustain the energy needed to run AI infrastructure at scale.

That was the central argument behind Huawei’s latest AI data center strategy unveiled at its Global AIDC Industry Summit in Dongguan.

The company introduced what it calls a grid-interactive AIDC strategy, focused on redesigning AI data centers around power supply, cooling systems and energy management. AIDC refers to AI data centers built specifically for large-scale AI computing workloads.

The announcement reflects a broader shift happening across the industry. As AI systems grow larger, data centers are consuming more electricity and generating more heat than traditional computing infrastructure was designed to handle. Companies are now being forced to rethink not just chips and servers, but the physical systems supporting them.

Huawei argues that future AI infrastructure will need closer coordination between computing systems and energy grids. The company says traditional data center designs are struggling to keep up with fluctuating AI workloads, rising power density and the growing use of renewable energy sources.

Hou Jinlong, Director of the Board of Huawei and President of Huawei Digital Power, said: "The booming AI industry, widely adopted large models, and numerous AI agents are creating huge energy demands, set to boost the global AIDC capacity. Electricity is essential for computing; energy is the foundation for AI long-term development. Computing and electricity will deeply synergize and empower each other, progressively building an integrated framework that brings together new power systems and AI infrastructure."

A large part of Huawei’s strategy focuses on power architecture. AI workloads can create sudden spikes in electricity demand, especially in high-density computing environments. To manage that, Huawei says it plans to develop new power systems that combine grid-friendly UPS infrastructure with energy storage technologies.

Cooling is becoming another major pressure point. AI servers generate significantly more heat than traditional enterprise systems and Huawei says liquid cooling is now becoming essential for large-scale AI deployments. The company introduced a liquid cooling system designed to improve long-term thermal management inside high-density AI environments.

Huawei is also pushing modular construction methods to reduce deployment times for AI data centers. Instead of building infrastructure entirely onsite, parts of the system can be prefabricated and tested in factories before installation.

Bob He, Vice President of Huawei Digital Power, said: "The global AI industry is booming, and the token demand surges. As such, the AIDC industry is entering the Token era."

As part of that shift, Huawei introduced a proposed measurement system called the TokEnergy Index. The company says the metric is designed to measure the relationship between energy consumption and AI computing output, rather than relying only on traditional data center efficiency metrics such as PUE.

The broader message behind the strategy is that AI infrastructure is becoming an energy engineering problem as much as a computing problem. As global demand for AI continues to rise, companies across the sector are beginning to realise that the future of AI may depend not only on better models, but also on whether power grids and data centers can keep up with them.

Investor interest in humanoid robotics is continuing to grow as startups race to build systems capable of working alongside humans in real-world environments. That momentum was reflected after WIRobotics announced a KRW 95 billion (USD 68 million) Series B funding round to accelerate development of its humanoid robotics platform, ALLEX.

The Seoul-based startup said the funding comes roughly two years after its KRW 13 billion Series A round in 2024. JB Investment led the financing alongside investors including InterVest, Hana Ventures, Smilegate Investment, SBVA, NH Investment & Securities, Company K Partners, GU Investment and FuturePlay.

WIRobotics has spent the past several years building wearable robotics systems designed to assist human movement. The startup is now using that foundation to expand deeper into humanoid robotics and Physical AI, a category focused on AI systems that can interact with the physical world through movement, perception and manipulation.

Its humanoid platform, ALLEX, is being developed to support human-level object manipulation and interaction capabilities. The startup was recently selected for NVIDIA’s Physical AI Fellowship, a global robotics and AI development initiative aimed at supporting next-generation robotics research.

Rather than building humanoid systems entirely from scratch, WIRobotics is drawing on movement data collected through its wearable walking-assist robot, WIM. Over the past three years, the startup says it has built large real-world datasets around gait patterns, mobility and human movement control.

That wearable robotics business has also started showing commercial traction. WIM has sold more than 3,000 cumulative units and expanded into overseas markets including Europe, China, Türkiye and Japan. Revenue grew from KRW 560 million in 2023 to KRW 1.3 billion in 2024, then to KRW 2.79 billion in 2025. According to the startup, first-quarter 2026 revenue has already surpassed its full-year 2024 total.

The startup believes that real-world movement data collected through wearable robotics could become a competitive advantage as humanoid systems move closer to commercial deployment. WIRobotics is also expanding its global footprint alongside its robotics development efforts. The startup said it is establishing a North American entity in California while growing partnerships with overseas distributors and healthcare networks.

Its humanoid ambitions are moving into a more operational phase as well. Beginning later this year, WIRobotics plans to supply a research-focused version of its Mobile ALLEX platform to global research institutions and international partners for testing and collaborative development. The startup is also in discussions with a global automotive manufacturer around manufacturing-focused platform validation projects.

Yeonbaek Lee said: "This investment represents global recognition that the real-world movement data and control technologies accumulated through wearable robotics can evolve into next-generation humanoid robotics. We aim to accelerate the arrival of humanoid robots capable of interacting naturally with people".

Yongjae Kim added: "All investors from our previous Series A round participated again in this Series B financing, demonstrating strong confidence in WIRobotics' technological capabilities and growth potential amid intensifying global humanoid competition. Our mission is to realize humanoids capable of fundamentally human-like interaction and force control, driving a paradigm shift in high-performance manipulation technologies".

As competition intensifies across humanoid robotics, startups are increasingly trying to differentiate themselves through real-world deployment data rather than simulation alone. WIRobotics is positioning its wearable robotics business as the foundation for that transition, betting that years of human movement data could help shape the next generation of humanoid systems.

As copyright disputes continue to grow around AI-generated music, Sonilo, the world’s first professionally licensed video-to-music AI platform, has partnered with Shutterstock to train its models on licensed music catalogs.

The agreement gives Sonilo access to Shutterstock’s music library for AI model training. According to the companies, it is Shutterstock’s first partnership with a video-to-music AI platform and the timing is significant. AI music companies are facing growing pressure over how their systems are trained. Artists and record labels have increasingly challenged the use of copyrighted music in AI datasets, especially when licensing agreements or compensation structures are unclear.

That tension has created a divide across the industry. Some companies have continued building models around scraped or disputed data. Others are trying to position licensing as part of the product itself.

Sonilo falls into the second group. The company says its models are trained only on licensed material where artists and rights holders have agreed to participate and receive compensation. The Shutterstock partnership strengthens that position while giving Sonilo access to a larger pool of commercially cleared music.

The collaboration also points to a broader change happening inside generative AI. As AI tools move into commercial production, companies are being pushed to show not just what their models can generate, but also where their training data comes from.

Sonilo’s platform is built around video rather than text prompts. The system analyses footage directly, studies pacing and emotional tone, then generates an original soundtrack to match the content. The company says this removes the need for manual music searches, syncing or editing workflows. The generated tracks are cleared for commercial use across social media, branded content and broadcast production.

Shawn Song, CEO of Sonilo, said: "Music has always been the last unsolved layer of video creation, and video has always carried its own soundtrack. We built Sonilo to hear it and compose from it, without a single text prompt. But how we build matters as much as what we build. While others have chosen to take artists' work without permission and charge creators for the privilege, we've chosen a different path—one where artists are compensated from day one. Partnering with Shutterstock reflects that standard. Every model we train meets a bar the music industry can stand behind, because the most innovative AI platforms don't have to come at the expense of the artists who make all of these possible."

For Shutterstock, the deal expands the company’s growing role in generative AI infrastructure. The company has increasingly focused on licensing content for AI systems across images, video and music.

Jessica April, Vice President of Data Licensing & AI Services at Shutterstock, said: "AI innovation depends on access to high-quality, rights-cleared content and trusted licensing partnerships. Sonilo's approach reflects the growing demand for responsibly sourced training data and commercially safe AI workflows. We're pleased to support companies building generative AI products with licensed content and scalable data solutions that help accelerate innovation while respecting creators and rights holders."

The partnership also comes as Sonilo expands into creator and developer ecosystems. Earlier this month, the company launched as a native node inside ComfyUI, an open-source AI workflow platform used by millions of creators. Sonilo also offers API access for integration into creator tools, video platforms, game engines and other AI systems.

As AI-generated music becomes more common across advertising, creator platforms and digital media, the industry’s focus is shifting beyond generation alone. Questions around licensing, ownership and compensation are increasingly shaping how AI music companies position themselves and build trust with creators.

Votee AI, an enterprise AI company headquartered in Hong Kong, has partnered with its Toronto-based research lab Beever AI to launch Beever Atlas. The new platform is designed to turn workplace chats into searchable knowledge that AI systems can retrieve and understand.

The release focuses on a growing issue inside organisations. Much of today’s workplace knowledge now exists inside chat platforms such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord and Telegram. Important discussions, project decisions and technical information often disappear into long message histories that are difficult to search later.

Beever AI developed the platform to organise those conversations into a structured system for AI assistants. The software connects with Telegram, Discord, Mattermost, Microsoft Teams and Slack, then converts conversations into linked records of people, projects, files and decisions.

The collaboration combines Votee AI’s enterprise infrastructure work with Beever AI’s research around AI memory systems. The companies are releasing two versions of the product. The open-source edition is aimed at individual developers, researchers and creators. The enterprise edition is designed for banks, government agencies and larger organisations with stricter security requirements.

The release also reflects a broader shift happening across the AI industry. Companies are increasingly looking at how AI systems store and retrieve long-term knowledge, rather than relying solely on large context windows or search-based retrieval.

Earlier this year, OpenAI founding member and former director of AI at Tesla  Andrej Karpathy discussed the growing need for what he described as “LLM Knowledge Bases.” He argued that AI systems need structured and evolving memory rather than depending only on context windows and vector search.

Beever Atlas approaches that problem through workplace communication. Instead of focusing mainly on uploaded files, the system is designed around conversations that happen daily across team chat platforms. It can also process images, PDFs, voice notes and video files within the same searchable system.

The companies say the software is designed to work directly with AI assistants and coding tools such as Cursor, AWS Kiro and Qwen Code. Integrations for OpenClaw and Hermes Agent are expected later in 2026.

Pak-Sun Ting, Co-Founder and CEO of Votee AI  said: "Hong Kong has always been known for property and finance. Beever Atlas is proof that world-class AI infrastructure can emerge from an HK-headquartered company and be shared openly with the world. Every growing organization faces the same silent liability: conversational knowledge loss. Beever Atlas turns this perishable resource into a compounding organizational asset."

A large part of the enterprise version focuses on privacy and access control. The system mirrors permissions from Slack and Microsoft Teams so users can only retrieve information they are already authorised to access. Permission updates are reflected automatically when access changes inside company systems.

The enterprise edition also includes audit logs, encryption controls and data retention settings for organisations handling sensitive internal data. Companies can run the software entirely inside their own infrastructure using Docker and connect it to their preferred AI models through LiteLLM.

The companies argue that organising information is more useful than simply storing chat archives. Jacky Chan Co-Founder and CTO of Votee AI said: "The key technical decision was to treat agent memory as a knowledge engineering problem, not a retrieval problem. Structure beats similarity — a typed graph of who works on what is more useful to an AI than vector search over a Slack archive."

The software also includes protections against prompt injection attacks and systems designed to reduce hallucinated responses. According to the companies, the AI is designed to return “I don't know” with citations when confidence is low instead of generating unsupported answers.

As workplace communication becomes increasingly fragmented across chat platforms, companies are beginning to treat internal conversations as information that AI systems can organise, retrieve and build on. Beever Atlas reflects a broader push to turn everyday workplace communication into long-term organisational memory.

A new survey from Povaddo, a policy research firm, suggests that concern about artificial intelligence is no longer limited to industry or academia. It is now firmly present within the policy community.

The survey draws on responses from 301 public policy professionals across the United States and Europe, including lawmakers, staffers and analysts involved in shaping and evaluating public policy. A majority of respondents—61%—say governments are falling short in addressing the negative impacts of AI.

There is also broad agreement that regulation needs to increase. In the United States, 92% of respondents support stronger AI regulation, compared to 70% in Europe. At a time when consensus is often difficult, the findings point to a shared view across policy circles that current frameworks are not keeping pace with technological development.

Differences emerge when looking at how AI is affecting national contexts. In the U.S., 57% of policy experts believe AI is already harming the labor market. In Europe, 34% say the same. U.S. respondents are also more likely to see AI as a greater threat to jobs than immigration, with 63% holding that view compared to 47% in Europe.

On misinformation, responses are closely aligned. A large majority of policy experts in both regions expect an AI-driven misinformation crisis within the next one to two years—87% in the U.S. and 82% in Europe. Many also believe that AI-generated or AI-amplified misinformation could affect elections and public health information.

Some respondents frame the risks in more fundamental terms. In the United States, 41% of policy experts say AI poses an existential threat to humanity. In Europe, 29% share that view. U.S. respondents are also more likely to believe that advances in AI could harm global security and stability.

The findings come as policymakers begin to respond more actively. In the U.S., Senators Josh Hawley, Richard Blumenthal and Mark Warner have introduced bipartisan legislation focused on AI accountability, including measures aimed at protecting workers and children.

In Europe, the introduction of the EU AI Act marks a more advanced regulatory approach. The framework sets out rules based on levels of risk and is widely seen as the first comprehensive attempt to govern AI at scale.

William Stewart, President and Founder of Povaddo, said: "What makes these findings so significant is who is saying it. These are the practitioners who work inside the policy process every day, spanning every corner of the policy world from defense to healthcare to finance, not activists or everyday citizens. These findings foreshadow real action. The current path of governments accelerating AI deployment while falling short on governance is not sustainable, and the people who know that best are the ones in this survey. You cannot have nine-in-ten policy insiders demanding more regulation and four-in-ten calling AI an existential threat without that eventually moving the needle in Washington and Brussels in terms of legislative or regulatory action".

Taken together, the survey reflects a shift in how AI is being discussed within policymaking circles. Concern is no longer limited to future risks. It is increasingly tied to current gaps in governance and the pace of deployment.

MagicLab Robotics is a Chinese startup that describes itself as an embodied AI company. At an event in Silicon Valley this week, it outlined its global ambitions and introduced new products designed for real-world use. The company said its international business now spans more than 50 countries and regions, with overseas markets accounting for 60% of total sales in 2025. That gives some indication of how quickly Chinese robotics firms are expanding beyond their home market.

At the centre of the announcement was MagicLab’s latest product line-up. It included Magic-Mix, described as a foundational world model for robots, the H01 dexterous robotic hand and its humanoid robot, MagicBot X1. In practical terms, the company is trying to build robots that can better understand their surroundings and perform physical tasks with greater precision. That is the core idea behind embodied AI, where intelligence is combined with movement and interaction in the real world rather than limited to software alone.

MagicLab says it develops both hardware and software internally. Its product range includes humanoid robots and four-legged machines, with systems designed for factories, commercial services and home use. The company also outlined where it sees demand emerging. It listed sectors such as healthcare, manufacturing, logistics, security, public safety, education and household assistance.

That wide spread of target markets reflects a broader challenge in robotics. Building capable machines is only one part of the equation. The harder task is finding enough practical uses where customers are willing to pay for them.

MagicLab also used the summit to set out a long-term commercial goal. It projected a path toward US$14 billion in annual revenue by 2036 through wider adoption of embodied AI systems. It also announced what it calls the “Co-Create 1000 Initiative”, a plan to work with external developers and partner companies.

As part of that effort, the startup said it plans to invest US$1 billion over the next five years to build a developer ecosystem that would allow third parties to create new applications for its robots. The strategy mirrors what happened in smartphones and cloud software, where ecosystems often mattered as much as the original hardware. If robotics follows a similar path, companies that attract developers could gain an advantage over those selling machines alone.

For now, MagicLab’s announcement is less about immediate breakthroughs and more about positioning. The company is presenting itself not simply as a robot maker, but as a platform business seeking a role in the next phase of intelligent machines.

Pudu Robotics, a Shenzhen-based startup building robots for commercial environments, has raised nearly US$150 million in a new funding round, pushing its valuation past US$1.5 billion. The raise brings the company’s total funding to more than US$300 million.

The company focuses on service robotics across sectors such as delivery, cleaning and industrial logistics. Its systems are used in places like retail stores, warehouses and public venues where routine tasks can be automated. Over time, Pudu has expanded from single-purpose machines to a broader portfolio that combines hardware with AI-driven navigation and coordination.

The funding is expected to support several areas of growth. These include further development of its AI systems, expansion of its product range and continued international rollout. The company also plans to invest in manufacturing and supply chain capacity, suggesting a focus on scaling production alongside demand.

Pudu’s recent growth provides some context for the raise. The company reported a doubling of revenue by 2025, with its cleaning robots now accounting for the majority of its business. Its industrial delivery robots have also seen early traction, with thousands of units deployed within a year of launch.

Its products are already in use with large global retailers including Carrefour, Walmart and EDEKA. Industry estimates place Pudu among the largest players in commercial service robotics, with a leading share of the global market.

Technically, the company develops much of its core stack in-house, including navigation systems, multi-robot coordination software and motion control. This allows its robots to operate in complex real-world environments where multiple machines need to move and work together.

“This financial milestone is a powerful confirmation of Pudu’s industry leadership, the strength of its products and technology, its global brand, and its commercial infrastructure. With the support of our strategic investors and industry partners, Pudu will continue to push the boundaries of embedded AI and business service robotics. We remain committed to innovating with an inventor’s spirit and leveraging a global vision to accelerate robot adoption, thereby elevating the industry to new heights in the global value chain”. said Felix Zhang, founder and CEO of Pudu Robotics.

The funding round points to a broader shift in the sector. As service robotics moves from pilot deployments to wider adoption, companies are increasingly being judged on their ability to scale production and operate across markets, not just on the novelty of their technology.

Flexcompute, a startup that builds software to simulate real-world physics, is working with Northrop Grumman to change how space missions are prepared. Together, they have developed an AI-based system that can predict how spacecraft respond during critical manoeuvres such as docking—when one spacecraft moves in and connects with another in orbit. These steps have traditionally taken months of preparation.

At the centre of this work is a long-standing problem in space operations. When a spacecraft fires its thrusters, the exhaust plume interacts with nearby surfaces. These interactions can affect movement, temperature and stability. Because these effects are difficult to test in real conditions, engineers have relied on large volumes of computer simulations to estimate outcomes before a mission. That process is slow and resource-intensive.

The new system replaces much of that workflow with a trained AI model. Instead of running millions of simulations, the model learns patterns from physics-based data and can make predictions in seconds. It also provides a measure of uncertainty, which helps engineers understand how reliable those predictions are when making decisions.

"At Northrop Grumman, we're pioneering physics AI to accelerate design and solve complex simulation and modelling problems like plume impingement—critical for station keeping, rendezvous and space robotics. Simply put: we're pushing the boundaries of advanced space operations", said Fahad Khan, Director of AI Foundations at Northrop Grumman. "Partnering with Flexcompute and NVIDIA, we're accelerating innovation and mission timelines to deliver superior space capabilities for customers at the speed they need".

The system is built using technology from NVIDIA, which provides the computing framework behind the model. Flexcompute has adapted it to handle the specific challenges of spaceflight, including how gases expand and interact in a vacuum. The result is a tool that can simulate complex scenarios much faster while maintaining the level of accuracy needed for mission planning.

By shortening preparation time, the model changes how engineers approach spacecraft design and operations. Faster predictions mean teams can test more scenarios and adjust plans more quickly. It also helps improve fuel use and extend the lifespan of spacecraft.

"Northrop Grumman's confidence reflects what sets Flexcompute apart", said Vera Yang, President and Co-Founder of Flexcompute. "We are able to take the most accurate and scalable physics foundations and evolve them into highly trained, customized Physics AI solutions that engineers can rely on. This work shows how we are transforming the role of simulation, not just speeding it up, but expanding what engineers can confidently solve and how quickly they can act".

The collaboration points to a broader shift in how engineering problems are being handled. Instead of relying only on detailed simulations that take time to run, companies are beginning to use AI systems that can approximate those results quickly while still reflecting the underlying physics.

"The industry's most ambitious space missions now demand a level of speed and precision that traditional engineering cycles can no longer sustain", said Tim Costa, vice president and general manager of computational engineering at NVIDIA. "By integrating NVIDIA PhysicsNeMo, Northrop Grumman and Flexcompute are transforming complex simulations like plume impingement from days of compute into seconds of insight, drastically accelerating the path from mission concept to orbit".

What emerges from this work is a shift in how missions are prepared. When prediction cycles move from months to seconds, testing and decision-making can happen faster. For space operations, where timing and precision are closely linked, that change could reshape how systems are built and run.