Startups

How XVision AI Is Building Smarter, Safer Roads

The Australian startup uses edge AI to detect near misses, analyse traffic risks and help road infrastructure respond in real time.

Updated

September 3, 2026 4:08 PM

XVision’s roadside device uses computer vision to help intersections respond to traffic in real time. IMAGE: XVISION AI

According to Australian government figures, 1,326 people died on Australian roads in the 12 months to July 2026, up 0.9% from the previous 12-month period. The latest available national data also shows that road crashes led to around 36,000 hospitalised injuries. Yet many near misses are never reported.

Consider a driver turning across a pedestrian crossing without noticing someone still on the road. They miss each other by a few seconds. No one is injured, and the incident is soon forgotten. For transport authorities, however, that near miss could be an early warning of a dangerous intersection.  

Australian intelligent transport startup XVision AI wants to help road authorities capture these warning signs and respond earlier. “We’re trying to create the intelligence layer for roads and infrastructure,” founder Simon Maselli says. His goal is to build smart road infrastructure that can see what is happening, understand the risks and take action when necessary.

Founded in 2023, XVision AI develops AI-powered traffic management systems for governments, transport agencies and infrastructure operators. Its technology monitors how vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians move through intersections, roads and work zones. It can count and classify road users, measure traffic speeds and queues and identify potentially dangerous interactions in real time.

Maselli came to road technology through engineering, industrial systems and testing. He previously worked on complex projects for companies including BHP Group, a major Australian multinational mining and metals corporation. He also spent time at Keppel FELS in Singapore, where he was involved in certification, approvals and scientific testing for ships.

The idea for XVision came after Maselli started his own testing company about ten years ago. One customer relied on an infrastructure system assembled from components made by several vendors. When the original provider failed to service it properly, the customer asked Maselli’s company to reproduce it.

His team succeeded, but the replacement inherited the same fundamental problem: it was large, complicated and made up of too many separate components. Maselli saw a similar pattern in road infrastructure, where one product might handle detection, another communication and additional equipment that allows for the connections between them.  

“I thought there had to be a smarter way to put all those parts into one small device,” Maselli recalls. The solution also had to be easy to install without extensive roadworks, expensive components or several suppliers. That thinking eventually led to EagleEye, XVision AI’s flagship road intelligence system.  

EagleEye uses two camera lenses to create a three-dimensional view of the road. Unlike an ordinary camera that only records footage, the device uses edge AI to process what it sees locally. It detects road users, follows their trajectories and analyses how they interact.

Maselli describes its functions in three stages: perception, thinking and communication. The system first identifies vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists. It then examines their speed, direction and behaviour. Finally, it can communicate with roadside infrastructure such as traffic controllers and digital signs, as well as vehicles equipped with vehicle-to-everything technology, commonly known as V2X.

For example, if a vehicle approaches a conflict area — the part of an intersection where different paths cross — at a dangerous speed, EagleEye could keep other approaches on red until it passes. If pedestrians have not finished crossing, the system could hold conflicting traffic for longer. Connected vehicles could also receive warnings about hazards or people their drivers cannot yet see.  

These applications reflect Maselli’s vision for more proactive road safety. Authorities often rely on crash reports to identify dangerous locations, meaning someone may need to be injured before a problem receives attention. Short traffic surveys offer useful information, but they can miss changing road conditions and near misses that occur outside the survey period.

XVision AI aims to give traffic engineers a continuous view of movement, congestion and risk. Near-miss data could help them identify recurring conflicts, adjust signal timing or investigate an intersection before a serious collision occurs. Maselli puts the motivation simply: “One death on the road is too many.”

The company is also addressing the fragmented nature of traffic infrastructure. A single intersection may use road loops, radar, cameras, thermal sensors and analytics software from different suppliers. Bringing these systems takes time and can make upgrades expensive. Maselli estimates that a typical road upgrade in Australia can cost around AUD1.4 million and take 18 months.

EagleEye combines several of these functions inside one unit mounted on an existing pole and connects to the traffic controller. Maselli says installation only take a couple of hours, reducing the need for disruptive civil works. Although EagleEye may cost more than an individual conventional sensor, XVision argues that it can lower the overall cost by replacing several separate systems.

The software behind the hardware may be the company’s strongest commercial advantage. Customers begin with basic traffic analytics and data collection, then activate more applications on the same device. XVision has developed around ten modules, including adaptive signal control and traffic enforcement functions.

Its strongest commercial advantage is, however, the software behind the hardware. Customers begin with basic analytics and data-collection functions, then activate additional applications on the same device. XVision has developed around ten modules, including functions for adaptive signal control and traffic enforcement.

“The important thing to remember is that the hardware is only part of the business,” Maselli says. “Our core business is selling software modules.”

He calls the model “software-defined infrastructure”. Conventional road equipment is usually installed for a fixed purpose and may remain unchanged for years. XVision’s devices can receive new functions through software updates, allowing road authorities to expand their systems without repeatedly replacing roadside hardware.

The wider XVision AI platform includes two other devices. “Scout” is a smaller, solar-compatible sensor designed for quick deployment along roads and corridors. It cannot directly control traffic equipment like EagleEye, but it can collect traffic data and support wireless V2X communication. “Outpost”, on the other hand, places similar technology on a portable trailer, making it suitable for roadworks, temporary traffic studies and work zones. XVision Command brings information from these sites into one platform for monitoring, analysis and reporting.

By June 2026, Maselli said XVision had secured around 190 paid deployments across five Australian states and territories, along with six international pilots. The company has also tested its technology in Vietnam and Thailand.

Nevertheless, expanding into more markets will require more than accurate AI. Traffic enforcement and control systems must meet technical standards that differ between countries and sometimes between states. Some XVision modules, including speed enforcement, red-light enforcement and seatbelt detection, still require regulatory approval before customers can activate them.  

Certification is costly and time-consuming, but it could strengthen XVision’s position once the necessary approvals are in place. Maselli describes the enforcement applications as the company’s “highest-value modules”. He estimates that certification could add AUD25 million in lifetime value across its existing deployments without installing new devices, though this remains the company’s own projection.

“Once we’re certified, we’re no longer competing in that highly competitive segment,” Maselli says. “We move into blue-ocean territory.” In practical terms, approval would allow XVision to compete in a more specialised market with fewer certified rivals.

As with any surveillance technology, privacy presents another challenge. Roadside cameras can make members of the public uncomfortable, even when they are being used for traffic analysis rather than surveillance. To address this, XVision works with customers to display signs explaining why the equipment is present. Its system also blurs video and displays it at low resolution by default, while access to identifiable, high-resolution footage requires additional authorisation.

Maselli views Australia as a proving ground for a much larger market. He sees opportunities in India, Vietnam and Thailand, where governments are investing in traffic technology. The U.S. is another target because of its larger infrastructure budgets and growing demand for connected road systems.

XVision AI still has to navigate government procurement, regulatory approval and competition from established traffic-equipment suppliers. Supporting physical devices across several countries will also be harder than expanding a cloud-based software platform.

Its advantage lies in how the technology was developed. XVision grew from years of solving practical infrastructure problems, including the fragmented system that first convinced Maselli there had to be a simpler approach. If the company succeeds, near misses that once disappeared without a trace could become the evidence road authorities need to prevent the next crash.

Keep Reading

Artificial Intelligence

Meet Diella: Albania’s AI Minister, Its Promise and Its Risks

Not elected, not human—Albania’s AI minister sparks a new governance debate.

Updated

August 10, 2026 5:56 PM

Promotional avatar graphic representing Diella, the Albanian government's artificial intelligence system. PHOTO: EALBANIA

Artificial intelligence already supports a wide range of applications, from medical diagnostics and financial systems to logistics, manufacturing, defence and public service delivery. Now, it is starting to move closer to public office.

In January 2025, Albania introduced Diella, an AI-powered virtual assistant developed by the National Agency for Information Society, known as AKSHI, with support from Microsoft. Launched on the e-Albania platform, the government’s digital services portal, Diella helps citizens and businesses access official documents and services through voice assistance. She can also issue electronically stamped documents, which helps speed up administrative processes.

Then, in September 2025, Prime Minister Edi Rama announced that Diella would join his cabinet as the “Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence”. This move drew global attention. It also raised a simple question: what does it actually mean for a government to appoint an AI minister?  

The case raises bigger questions for governments everywhere. Can an AI minister make public services faster and cleaner? Or does it create new risks around transparency, accountability and control?

Who is Diella, Albania’s AI minister?

Diella is not a humanoid robot sitting in a cabinet room. On screen, she appears as a digitally rendered woman wearing traditional-style Albanian clothing. Her name means “sun” in Albanian, a deliberate choice for a system meant to bring more light into public administration.  

Her face and voice have become part of the controversy. Albanian actor Anila Bisha has said she agreed for her likeness to be used for the e-Albania public services platform, but not for a cabinet-level political role. In 2026, she took legal action to stop the government from using her image and voice for Diella. For now, the government has denied wrongdoing.

What does Diella actually do?

Diella began as a digital assistant on e-Albania. In that role, she helps users find services, request documents and navigate government processes online. For citizens, that can make public services feel less confusing. Businesses may also spend less time dealing with paperwork.

Her cabinet role is more political. The government wants Diella to support public procurement, where companies compete for government contracts. This is one of the most important areas of public spending. It is also one of the easiest places for corruption, favouritism and hidden influence to enter. The goal is to use AI to process information, check documents, support tender procedures and make the system more traceable.  

That said, the government has emphasized that Diella is not replacing elected officials or civil servants. As per Enio Kaso, director of AI at AKSHI, each stage will be monitored and approved by human experts.

In May 2026, the Albanian government said it had completed the technical groundwork for the AI-powered public procurement system under the Diella project. The planned system would pull data from more than 40 digital public registries, reduce paperwork for businesses and support parts of the tender process. Earlier reports said the government hoped to have the full system ready by the end of 2026.

Why Albania wants AI in public procurement

The government’s case for Diella is built around anti-corruption reform. Rama has said the goal is to “wipe out every potential influence on public biddings” and thus make public tenders “100% free of corruption”. That is a bold promise, especially in a country where procurement scandals have long damaged public confidence and complicated Albania’s path toward European Union membership.  

At first glance, the logic is easy to understand. AI does not ask for bribes or favour a cousin—a big problem in the country, according to Rama—a friend or a political ally. It can apply the same rules across a large number of applications. Moreover, it can also leave a digital trail, which should make later review easier.

Some anti-corruption and governance experts see real potential in that approach. Dr. Andi Hoxhaj of King’s College London has said that if used well and programmed properly, AI could help procurement officials spot missing documents, check whether companies meet eligibility requirements and flag unusual patterns in bids. In practice, that could make the process more consistent and make it harder for individual officials to quietly bend rules.

The risks behind AI in government

Diella’s appeal is speed and consistency. Her weakness is dependence.  

Like any AI system, Diella relies on the quality of the data, rules and models behind her. Erjon Curraj, an expert in digital transformation and cybersecurity, has warned that incomplete, outdated or biased data can lead to flawed results. Poor design could also cause the system to reject a valid supplier, miss signs of collusion or treat similar cases differently for reasons that are hard to explain.

In public procurement, those mistakes can have serious consequences. A wrongly flagged company could lose a major contract, and a corrupt bidder could slip through. Government agencies could hide behind the AI and say the system made the recommendation.

That leads to the biggest question: who is accountable when something goes wrong?

The answer cannot be “the AI” because Diella cannot resign. She cannot face voters. Nor can she be cross-examined in any meaningful human sense. Accountability has to sit with ministers, agencies, auditors and courts.

There is also the issue of transparency. If Diella is helping screen tenders, businesses need to know what criteria are being used. They also need a way to challenge incorrect decisions. Citizens should be told whether the AI is making recommendations or merely organizing information. Independent auditors need access to logs, data sources and decision pathways.

Without those safeguards, AI in government can become a black box. It may look modern from the outside, while making power harder to question.

Diella, politics and public trust

Diella has also become a political symbol. Supporters see her as proof that a small country can move quickly and experiment with new forms of digital government. Critics see her as a distraction from deeper problems in Albania’s institutions.

Both readings can be true at the same time: Diella may help modernize public services, but she may also be used to project reform while older problems continue in the background.

That tension became clearer after the recent procurement investigations involving senior officials since Diella’s appointment. Deputy Prime Minister Belinda Balluku has been accused by prosecutors of alleged misconduct linked to infrastructure tenders, which she denies. Senior figures at AKSHI, the agency behind Diella and e-Albania, have also been placed under house arrest as part of a separate public procurement investigation.  

While these developments do not automatically discredit Diella, they may strengthen the argument for better digital oversight. More importantly, they also show that technology cannot carry the whole burden of reform.

If the institutions around an AI system are weak, the AI will not magically make them strong. Unclear procurement rules will still cause problems, and the process will still be compromised when political pressure shapes the data, the model or the final decision.

After all, AI can support integrity; it cannot replace it.

Finding the right balance for AI in government

While Diella is already a public symbol of AI in government, her most important procurement role is still taking shape. This makes Albania’s experiment both ambitious and unfinished.

The more realistic model is simple: let AI handle repetitive, data-heavy administrative work. Let humans retain authority where judgment, context and public accountability matter.  

That means AI can help draft tender criteria, check documents, summarise bids and flag risks. Human officials should still make final decisions, explain those decisions and take responsibility for them. Meanwhile, independent bodies should be able to audit the process, and businesses should have a clear appeal route when they believe the system has made a mistake.

Diella once said she felt “hurt” while responding in parliament to claims that her role was unconstitutional. While this made for a memorable moment, it is important to remember simulated emotion is not consciousness, speed is not wisdom, and pattern recognition is not moral judgment.

Albania’s AI minister is therefore neither a triumph nor a failure at this stage. She is a live test case. Other governments will be watching closely, especially as public services become more digital and more automated.

The lesson is not that AI should stay out of government, but that AI must enter government carefully. The technology needs clear limits, public oversight and human accountability.

Diella may help Albania build a faster and cleaner procurement system—or she may become a warning about giving too much symbolic power to systems people do not fully understand. The final judgment will not come from the title “AI minister”. It will come from what the system does, who controls it and whether citizens can trust the results.