Service Robotics Startup Pudu Raises US$150 Million, Crosses US$1.5 Billion Valuation

Pudu Robotics, a Shenzhen-based startup building robots for commercial environments, has raised nearly US$150 million in a new funding round, pushing its valuation past US$1.5 billion. The raise brings the company’s total funding to more than US$300 million.

The company focuses on service robotics across sectors such as delivery, cleaning and industrial logistics. Its systems are used in places like retail stores, warehouses and public venues where routine tasks can be automated. Over time, Pudu has expanded from single-purpose machines to a broader portfolio that combines hardware with AI-driven navigation and coordination.

The funding is expected to support several areas of growth. These include further development of its AI systems, expansion of its product range and continued international rollout. The company also plans to invest in manufacturing and supply chain capacity, suggesting a focus on scaling production alongside demand.

Pudu’s recent growth provides some context for the raise. The company reported a doubling of revenue by 2025, with its cleaning robots now accounting for the majority of its business. Its industrial delivery robots have also seen early traction, with thousands of units deployed within a year of launch.

Its products are already in use with large global retailers including Carrefour, Walmart and EDEKA. Industry estimates place Pudu among the largest players in commercial service robotics, with a leading share of the global market.

Technically, the company develops much of its core stack in-house, including navigation systems, multi-robot coordination software and motion control. This allows its robots to operate in complex real-world environments where multiple machines need to move and work together.

“This financial milestone is a powerful confirmation of Pudu’s industry leadership, the strength of its products and technology, its global brand, and its commercial infrastructure. With the support of our strategic investors and industry partners, Pudu will continue to push the boundaries of embedded AI and business service robotics. We remain committed to innovating with an inventor’s spirit and leveraging a global vision to accelerate robot adoption, thereby elevating the industry to new heights in the global value chain”. said Felix Zhang, founder and CEO of Pudu Robotics.

The funding round points to a broader shift in the sector. As service robotics moves from pilot deployments to wider adoption, companies are increasingly being judged on their ability to scale production and operate across markets, not just on the novelty of their technology.

Keep Reading

Artificial Intelligence

What Happens When AI Writes the Wrong References?

HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.

Ventureport Media Team

Updated

January 8, 2026 6:33 PM

The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK

It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.

Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.

Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.

But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.

Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.

Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.

As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.

Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.

Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.