The Hong Kong startup combines 3D-printed reef tiles, biodiversity monitoring and long-term data to help companies manage their impact on marine ecosystems.
Updated
August 7, 2026 4:10 AM
Young corals growing on Archireef's 3D-printed terracotta reef tiles beneath the sea. IMAGE: ARCHIREFF
Anyone who has snorkeled over a coral reef has probably admired its vibrant colours and the marine life swimming between its branches. What is less visible is how easily these ecosystems can be damaged. Rising ocean temperatures and pollution continue to put reefs under pressure, while coastal development creates another threat. Construction can stir up sediment that settles on corals, blocking the sunlight they need and making it harder for damaged reefs to recover.
Protecting marine ecosystems is becoming a shared responsibility. Alongside scientists, governments and conservation groups, businesses whose operations affect the ocean are increasingly expected to understand, manage and reduce their environmental impact. They must also show regulators, banks and investors that they are meeting their environmental commitments.
Archireef helps businesses meet those demands. Founded by Vriko Yu, the Hong Kong-rooted B2B startup specializes in marine ecosystem restoration and ocean nature risk management. Drawing on years of research at the University of Hong Kong, Yu built the company to help organisations understand, measure and reduce their impact on marine ecosystems.
Yu describes Archireef as an “end-to-end ocean nature risk management company”.
“What we offer them is a credible way to meet those obligations and stand behind the results,” she says.
One of the company’s main tools for restoring damaged marine ecosystems is its flagship 3D-printed terracotta reef tile. The tiles provide a stable foundation where young corals can attach, grow and survive over time.
Archireef chose terracotta instead of concrete and other conventional materials because it is pH-neutral and does not release harmful chemicals into the water. Its surface also gives corals a suitable place to attach naturally.
Before placing a single tile in the ocean, the team studies the proposed restoration site to determine whether recovery is possible. It assesses the water quality, biodiversity and general health of the ecosystem. As Yu explains, restoration should begin only where nature has a realistic chance to recover.
“Restoration isn’t about replacing nature or engineering a reef into existence. It is about removing the barriers and giving a degraded system the conditions it needs to begin recovering on its own”, she says.
Once the team selects a site, divers carefully place the tiles on the seabed. Their curves, ridges and crevices imitate the structure of a natural coral reef, creating sheltered spaces for marine species. The design also helps limit sediment build-up, which can block sunlight and smother young corals.
.webp)
Archireef adjusts the shape of its reef tiles for each project.
“There’s no universal reef, so there’s no universal tile”, Yu says.
Instead of producing one standard model, the company adapts each design to the coral species, water conditions and surrounding marine environment. A coral restoration project in Hong Kong may therefore require a different tile from one in Saudi Arabia, even when the same manufacturing process is used.
“The biggest adaptation from site to site is usually the match between design, species and environment, not the manufacturing itself ”, Yu explains.
Although the reef tile is Archireef’s most recognizable innovation, Yu sees it as one part of a much broader service.
“The reef tile gets the attention because it’s tangible,” she says. “But the real product is the proof — defensible, audit-ready evidence of nature recovery that an organization can put in a disclosure and stand behind under scrutiny”.
Producing that evidence requires years of biodiversity monitoring. Long after the reef tiles have been installed, Archireef continues to track coral survival and the health of the surrounding marine ecosystem. Its monitoring methods include ecological surveys, AI-assisted species recognition, photogrammetry and environmental DNA testing.
Photogrammetry uses photographs to produce detailed 3D models of the reef. These models allow the team to measure changes in coral growth and reef structure over time.
Environmental DNA, commonly known as eDNA, offers another way to monitor marine biodiversity. Traditional ecological surveys often depend on divers recording the species they can see. eDNA testing instead examines traces of genetic material left in the water by marine organisms, including skin cells, mucus and waste.
By analyzing these traces, Archireef can detect species that may be hidden, difficult to identify or absent during a dive. This gives the company a more complete picture of the ecosystem and how it is changing.
For Archireef, the success of a coral reef restoration project is determined by what happens several years after installation.
“The indicators that matter aren’t the ones that look good on deployment day”, Yu says. “They’re the ones that show, two, three and five years on, whether a genuine ecosystem is establishing and sustaining itself”.
At the company’s first restoration site in Hoi Ha Wan, Hong Kong, around 90% of the transplanted corals remained alive four years after deployment. The long-term survival rate suggests that the ecosystem is recovering rather than simply appearing healthy during the early stages of the project.
Results like these have helped Archireef move beyond academic research and secure collaborations across the public and private sectors. In Hong Kong, the company has worked with government departments and public organisations responsible for coastal infrastructure and marine conservation.
Keep Reading
How Korea is trying to take control of its AI future.
Updated
January 13, 2026 10:56 AM
SK Telecom Headquarters in Seoul, South Korea. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
SK Telecom, South Korea’s largest mobile operator, has unveiled A.X K1, a hyperscale artificial intelligence model with 519 billion parameters. The model sits at the center of a government-backed effort to build advanced AI systems and domestic AI infrastructure within Korea. This comes at a time when companies in the United States and China largely dominate the development of the most powerful large language models.
Rather than framing A.X K1 as just another large language model, SK Telecom is positioning it as part of a broader push to build sovereign AI capacity from the ground up. The model is being developed as part of the Korean government’s Sovereign AI Foundation Model project, which aims to ensure that core AI systems are built, trained and operated within the country. In simple terms, the initiative focuses on reducing reliance on foreign AI platforms and cloud-based AI infrastructure, while giving Korea more control over how artificial intelligence is developed and deployed at scale.
One of the gaps this approach is trying to address is how AI knowledge flows across a national ecosystem. Today, the most powerful AI foundation models are often closed, expensive and concentrated within a small number of global technology companies. A.X K1 is designed to function as a “teacher model,” meaning it can transfer its capabilities to smaller, more specialized AI systems. This allows developers, enterprises and public institutions to build tailored AI tools without starting from scratch or depending entirely on overseas AI providers.
That distinction matters because most real-world applications of artificial intelligence do not require massive models operating independently. They require focused, reliable AI systems designed for specific use cases such as customer service, enterprise search, manufacturing automation or mobility. By anchoring those systems to a large, domestically developed foundation model, SK Telecom and its partners are aiming to create a more resilient and self-sustaining AI ecosystem.
The effort also reflects a shift in how AI is being positioned for everyday use. SK Telecom plans to connect A.X K1 to services that already reach millions of users, including its AI assistant platform A., which operates across phone calls, messaging, web services and mobile applications. The broader goal is to make advanced AI feel less like a distant research asset and more like an embedded digital infrastructure that supports daily interactions.
This approach extends beyond consumer-facing services. Members of the SKT consortium are testing how the hyperscale AI model can support industrial and enterprise applications, including manufacturing systems, game development, robotics and autonomous technologies. The underlying logic is that national competitiveness in artificial intelligence now depends not only on model performance, but on whether those models can be deployed, adapted and validated in real-world environments.
There is also a hardware dimension to the project. Operating an AI model at the 500-billion-parameter scale places heavy demands on computing infrastructure, particularly memory performance and communication between processors. A.X K1 is being used to test and validate Korea’s semiconductor and AI chip capabilities under real workloads, linking large-scale AI software development directly to domestic semiconductor innovation.
The initiative brings together technology companies, universities and research institutions, including Krafton, KAIST and Seoul National University. Each contributes specialized expertise ranging from data validation and multimodal AI research to system scalability. More than 20 institutions have already expressed interest in testing and deploying the model, reinforcing the idea that A.X K1 is being treated as shared national AI infrastructure rather than a closed commercial product.
Looking ahead, SK Telecom plans to release A.X K1 as open-source AI software, alongside APIs and portions of the training data. If fully implemented, the move could lower barriers for developers, startups and researchers across Korea’s AI ecosystem, enabling them to build on top of a large-scale foundation model without incurring the cost and complexity of developing one independently.