AI growth is increasingly becoming a manufacturing, packaging and deployment challenge — not just a computing one.
Updated
May 26, 2026 5:28 PM
Taipei 101 and Taipei Nan Shan Plaza, viewed from Elephant Mountain. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
As AI companies continue scaling larger models and data centers, the pressure is no longer falling only on chip design. Manufacturing capacity, advanced packaging and infrastructure deployment are becoming equally important parts of the AI race. AMD’s latest investment announcement reflects how quickly that shift is accelerating.
The US chipmaker announced plans to invest more than US$10 billion across Taiwan’s semiconductor and manufacturing ecosystem to support next-generation AI infrastructure. The investment focuses on expanding partnerships and increasing advanced packaging capacity needed for future AI systems.
The announcement highlights a growing reality across the AI industry. Building powerful AI chips is no longer enough on its own. Companies now also need the manufacturing networks, packaging technologies and supply chain coordination required to deploy AI infrastructure at global scale.
AMD’s investments center heavily around advanced chip packaging, an area becoming increasingly critical as AI systems demand higher performance and greater power efficiency. Traditional chip architectures are struggling to keep pace with the size and complexity of modern AI workloads. Advanced packaging helps connect processors, memory and computing systems more efficiently while managing power and cooling limitations inside large-scale AI environments.
The company said it is working with Taiwan-based partners including ASE, SPIL and PTI to develop next-generation packaging technologies for its upcoming 6th Gen AMD EPYC processors, codenamed “Venice.” AMD also said it had qualified what it described as the industry’s first 2.5D panel-based EFB interconnect technology alongside PTI.
At the center of the broader strategy is AMD Helios, the company’s rack-scale AI infrastructure platform scheduled for deployment beginning in the second half of 2026. The platform combines AMD Instinct MI450X GPUs, 6th Gen EPYC CPUs, networking systems and AMD’s ROCm software stack into integrated AI infrastructure systems designed for hyperscale deployment.
Rather than selling individual processors alone, companies are increasingly building complete AI infrastructure platforms that combine hardware, software, cooling systems and power management into unified deployments. That transition is reshaping how AI infrastructure is designed, manufactured and delivered.
Taiwan is also becoming more deeply embedded in that process. AMD’s investment spans not only semiconductor packaging companies but also manufacturing and system integration partners including Sanmina, Wiwynn, Wistron and Inventec. The partnerships reflect Taiwan’s growing role as one of the operational centers of the global AI infrastructure economy.
Dr. Lisa Su, Chair and CEO of AMD, said: “As AI adoption accelerates, our global customers are rapidly scaling AI infrastructure to meet growing compute demand. By combining AMD leadership in high-performance computing with the Taiwan ecosystem and our strategic global partners, we are enabling integrated, rack-scale AI infrastructure that helps customers accelerate deployment of next-generation AI systems”.
Power efficiency is becoming another major challenge shaping AI infrastructure decisions. As AI workloads consume more electricity and generate more heat, infrastructure providers are increasingly being forced to rethink cooling systems, interconnect technologies and deployment economics.
AMD’s announcement signals how the AI competition is evolving beyond model development and raw computing power. The next stage may depend just as heavily on who can manufacture, package and deploy AI infrastructure fast enough to support global demand.
Keep Reading
A rare policy consensus emerges as AI’s impact moves beyond innovation into governance and societal risk
Updated
May 26, 2026 5:40 PM
A mechanical hand reaching for the hand of flesh. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
A new survey from Povaddo, a policy research firm, suggests that concern about artificial intelligence is no longer limited to industry or academia. It is now firmly present within the policy community.
The survey draws on responses from 301 public policy professionals across the United States and Europe, including lawmakers, staffers and analysts involved in shaping and evaluating public policy. A majority of respondents—61%—say governments are falling short in addressing the negative impacts of AI.
There is also broad agreement that regulation needs to increase. In the United States, 92% of respondents support stronger AI regulation, compared to 70% in Europe. At a time when consensus is often difficult, the findings point to a shared view across policy circles that current frameworks are not keeping pace with technological development.
Differences emerge when looking at how AI is affecting national contexts. In the U.S., 57% of policy experts believe AI is already harming the labor market. In Europe, 34% say the same. U.S. respondents are also more likely to see AI as a greater threat to jobs than immigration, with 63% holding that view compared to 47% in Europe.
On misinformation, responses are closely aligned. A large majority of policy experts in both regions expect an AI-driven misinformation crisis within the next one to two years—87% in the U.S. and 82% in Europe. Many also believe that AI-generated or AI-amplified misinformation could affect elections and public health information.
Some respondents frame the risks in more fundamental terms. In the United States, 41% of policy experts say AI poses an existential threat to humanity. In Europe, 29% share that view. U.S. respondents are also more likely to believe that advances in AI could harm global security and stability.
The findings come as policymakers begin to respond more actively. In the U.S., Senators Josh Hawley, Richard Blumenthal and Mark Warner have introduced bipartisan legislation focused on AI accountability, including measures aimed at protecting workers and children.
In Europe, the introduction of the EU AI Act marks a more advanced regulatory approach. The framework sets out rules based on levels of risk and is widely seen as the first comprehensive attempt to govern AI at scale.
William Stewart, President and Founder of Povaddo, said: "What makes these findings so significant is who is saying it. These are the practitioners who work inside the policy process every day, spanning every corner of the policy world from defense to healthcare to finance, not activists or everyday citizens. These findings foreshadow real action. The current path of governments accelerating AI deployment while falling short on governance is not sustainable, and the people who know that best are the ones in this survey. You cannot have nine-in-ten policy insiders demanding more regulation and four-in-ten calling AI an existential threat without that eventually moving the needle in Washington and Brussels in terms of legislative or regulatory action".
Taken together, the survey reflects a shift in how AI is being discussed within policymaking circles. Concern is no longer limited to future risks. It is increasingly tied to current gaps in governance and the pace of deployment.