An interview with Tengin founder Madhu on turning coconuts into a business built around farmers, villages and communities.
Updated
June 1, 2026 1:46 PM

Workers of Tengin. PHOTO: TENGIN
In Southern India, coconuts are part of daily life. They are used in food, rituals, farming and home remedies. For Tengin, a social startup whose name means “coconut” in Kannada—a South Indian language—the crop also offers a way to build a rural business with deeper local impact.
Founded by Madhu Kargunda in 2017, Tengin works with farmers, artisans and women’s collectives in Karnataka to make products from almost every part of the coconut. Its range includes virgin coconut oil, desiccated coconut powder, shell-based handicrafts, candles, home décor items and other coconut-based goods.
The larger idea is simple. Farmers should play a bigger role in the value created from the crops they grow. Tengin is trying to help rural communities move beyond supplying raw produce and take part in processing, branding, packaging and sales.
Madhu grew up in an agricultural family. Over the years, he saw many young people move away from farming to look for stable jobs in cities. To him, the problem was not farming itself. The bigger issue was that farmers often missed out on the value created after crops left the farm.
A coconut might be grown in a village, but much of the income comes later through processing, branding and retail. That gap stayed with him, eventually leading him to leave his eight-year career in IT and return to agriculture full-time.

Started with just making virgin coconut oil, Tengin has grown into a wider coconut products business. The startup is now working with around 15 to 20 farmers and artisan groups across Karnataka. It is also building production capacity for larger retail and B2B partnerships.
Today, Tengin generates annual revenue of roughly ₹50-60 lakh, or around US$52,000 to US$62,000. It has also started testing international demand, including a recent export of around 200 kilograms of desiccated coconut powder to Texas.
As Tengin expanded, the team began looking more closely at parts of the coconut that were usually treated as waste or low-value byproducts, such as coconut shells and coir. At first, Tengin treated them that way too.
“When we started, we used to burn some of the shells”, Madhu said. “Later, we realized it was an economic opportunity”.
That changed the company’s product strategy. Local artisans working with Tengin now are turning coconut shells into bowls, incense holders, candles, coffee mugs, mobile stands and handcrafted décor items.

This gives Tengin a place in the circular economy, where waste materials are reused instead of thrown away. For Madhu, though, sustainability has to do more than reduce waste. It should also create income in the community.
“We wanted to minimize waste and maximize wealth locally”, he said.
Tengin does not depend only on one central factory. Instead, it works with smaller village-level production groups that connect to a larger business network. This helps farmers stay close to their land while also taking part in processing and manufacturing. It also creates local jobs, which can reduce the pressure to migrate to cities.
Yet, the model is not always easy. In the early days, Tengin had to convince some farmers to move from chemical farming to natural farming. Moreover, the weather has also become harder to predict. Irregular rainfall and changing harvest cycles can affect coconut prices and production consistency.
Still, Madhu sees the village-based model as central to Tengin’s identity. For him, villages are living systems built on shared work, local knowledge and interdependence.
“The definition of a village is inclusiveness”, he said.

That belief also shaped Tengin’s “coco tourism” initiative. Through the program, visitors meet farmers, learn about farming practices and see how coconut products are made.
During one visit by MBA students from Indiana State University, an unexpected spell of rain gave the group a closer look at village life. Farmers gathered and began singing traditional folk songs to express gratitude to nature. For the students, it became a lesson in culture as much as business.
Madhu sees these moments as part of what rural entrepreneurship can protect.
“If villages become empty, we lose language, traditions and local knowledge too”, he said.
Tengin’s model is not difficult to copy on paper. Madhu is open about that.
“Anyone can do it”, he said, “but what matters is how you work with people”.
For him, the harder part is building long-term trust with farming communities. Tengin works through relationships more than rigid contracts. This encourages farmers and local groups to participate in the system in a more collaborative way.
That trust has become one of the startup’s strongest assets. It shapes how Tengin works with producers and how it presents its products to customers.
For Madhu, it is not enough to call a product sustainable. Customers should be able to understand where it came from, who made it and how their purchase supports the people behind it.

That matters even more in a market where terms like “eco-friendly” and “organic” have become buzzwords. Madhu knows that these words can feel empty when brands do not show what they actually mean.
“Anyone can use these words today,” he said. “What matters is whether consumers can actually see what you are doing”.
This is why Tengin focuses on transparency and storytelling. The startup wants customers to see the full journey of each coconut product, from the farm to the finished item. It also wants them to understand whose livelihood is connected to that journey.
Madhu also believes small brands cannot depend on products alone. Products can be copied, but a clear story, a trusted community and a visible impact are harder to replicate.
“Don’t try to sell only the product,” he said. “When you try to sell the product, you are being sold once”.
Each Tengin product includes details about the people behind it and how profits are shared. In that way, the company connects its coconut products to the farmers, artisans and village systems that make them possible.
For Madhu, entrepreneurship starts with the problem. Founders, he believes, should understand the problem deeply before thinking about scale and revenue.
“An entrepreneur is someone trying to solve an existing problem”, he said. “Sometimes it may be a small problem, sometimes a niche one. It could be in technology, energy, farming or any other sector—but first understand what problem you are trying to solve”.
Farming has also taught him patience. He gives the example of coffee.
“When you plant coffee, you know it may take five years before you see results”, he said, “but you still [have to] water it every day”.
He sees entrepreneurship the same way. Building systems, communities and trust takes time. Growth may be slow at first, but daily work matters.
Adaptability is another lesson he returns to often. Farming conditions change constantly, and so do markets. In both cases, people have to keep learning, unlearning and adjusting.
“Entrepreneurship is about constantly learning new things because the world is changing all the time”, he said. “You need to stay relevant, understand what connects with [your customers] and adapt accordingly”.
Looking ahead, Tengin plans to grow its farmer network, strengthen production capacity and expand its export business. Madhu is also looking to collaborate with more platforms, storytellers and communities that can help amplify the voices behind the products.
The startup is also involved in rural community initiatives, including support for government schools and menstrual health awareness programs.
For Madhu, giving back is part of how he defines success. With more resources, he would invest further in farmer education, village-level production systems and community development.
By building a business around coconuts, Tengin is also making a larger case for rural entrepreneurship. Its work shows that a modern consumer brand can grow without losing its connection to the farmers, traditions and village ecosystems that make that growth possible. For Madhu, that is the real measure of progress: creating value that stays rooted in the community.
Keep Reading
A closer look at the tech, AI, and open ecosystem behind Tien Kung 3.0’s real-world push
Updated
March 17, 2026 1:02 AM

Humanoid robots working in a warehouse. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
Humanoid robotics has advanced quickly in recent years. Machines can now walk, balance, and interact with their surroundings in ways that once seemed out of reach. Yet most deployments remain limited. Many robots perform well in controlled settings but struggle in real-world environments. Integration is often complex, hardware interfaces are closed, software tools are fragmented, and scaling across industries remains difficult.
Against this backdrop, X-Humanoid has introduced its latest general-purpose platform, Embodied Tien Kung 3.0. The company positions it not simply as another humanoid robot, but as a system designed to address the practical barriers that have slowed adoption, with a focus on openness and usability.
At the hardware level, Embodied Tien Kung 3.0 is built for mobility, strength, and stability. It is equipped with high-torque integrated joints that provide strong limb force for high-load applications. The company says it is the first full-size humanoid robot to achieve whole-body, high-dynamic motion control integrated with tactile interaction. In practice, this means the robot is designed to maintain balance and execute dynamic movements even in uneven or cluttered environments. It can clear one-meter obstacles, perform consecutive high-dynamic maneuvers, and carry out actions such as kneeling, bending, and turning with coordinated whole-body control.
Precision is also a focus. Through multi-degree-of-freedom limb coordination and calibrated joint linkage, the system is designed to achieve millimeter-level operational accuracy. This level of control is intended to support industrial-grade tasks that require consistent performance and minimal error across changing conditions.
But hardware is only part of the equation. The company pairs the robot with its proprietary Wise KaiWu general-purpose embodied AI platform. This system supports perception, reasoning, and real-time control through what the company describes as a coordinated “brain–cerebellum” architecture. It establishes a continuous perception–decision–execution loop, allowing the robot to operate with greater autonomy and reduced reliance on remote control.
For higher-level cognition, Wise KaiWu incorporates components such as a world model and vision-language models (VLM) to interpret visual scenes, understand language instructions, and break complex objectives into structured steps. For real-time execution, a vision-language-action (VLA) model and full autonomous navigation system manage obstacle avoidance and precise motion under variable conditions. The platform also supports multi-agent collaboration, enabling cross-platform compatibility, asynchronous task coordination, and centralized scheduling across multiple robots.
A central part of the platform is openness. The company states that the system is designed to address compatibility and adaptation challenges across both development and deployment layers. On the hardware side, Embodied Tien Kung 3.0 includes multiple expansion interfaces that support different end-effectors and tools, allowing faster adaptation to industrial manufacturing, specialized operations, and commercial service scenarios. On the software side, the Wise KaiWu ecosystem provides documentation, toolchains, and a low-code development environment. It supports widely adopted communication standards, including ROS2, MQTT, and TCP/IP, enabling partners to customize applications without rebuilding core systems.
The company also highlights its open-source approach. X-Humanoid has open-sourced key components from the Embodied Tien Kung and Wise KaiWu platforms, including the robot body architecture, motion control framework, world model, embodied VLM and cross-ontology VLA models, training toolchains, the RoboMIND dataset, and the ArtVIP simulation asset library. By opening access to these elements, the company aims to reduce development costs, lower technical barriers, and encourage broader participation from researchers, universities, and enterprises.
Embodied Tien Kung 3.0 enters a market where technical progress is visible but large-scale adoption remains uneven. The gap is not only about movement or strength. It is about integration, interoperability, and the ability to operate reliably and autonomously in everyday industrial and commercial settings. If platforms can reduce fragmentation and simplify deployment, humanoid robots may move beyond demonstrations and into sustained commercial use.
In that sense, the significance of Embodied Tien Kung 3.0 lies less in isolated technical claims and more in how its high-dynamic hardware, embodied AI system, open interfaces, and collaborative architecture are structured to work together. Whether that integrated approach can close the deployment gap will shape how quickly humanoid robotics becomes part of real-world operations.