A rare policy consensus emerges as AI’s impact moves beyond innovation into governance and societal risk
Updated
May 5, 2026 5:42 PM
A mechanical hand reaching for the hand of flesh. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
A new survey from Povaddo, a policy research firm, suggests that concern about artificial intelligence is no longer limited to industry or academia. It is now firmly present within the policy community.
The survey draws on responses from 301 public policy professionals across the United States and Europe, including lawmakers, staffers and analysts involved in shaping and evaluating public policy. A majority of respondents—61%—say governments are falling short in addressing the negative impacts of AI.
There is also broad agreement that regulation needs to increase. In the United States, 92% of respondents support stronger AI regulation, compared to 70% in Europe. At a time when consensus is often difficult, the findings point to a shared view across policy circles that current frameworks are not keeping pace with technological development.
Differences emerge when looking at how AI is affecting national contexts. In the U.S., 57% of policy experts believe AI is already harming the labor market. In Europe, 34% say the same. U.S. respondents are also more likely to see AI as a greater threat to jobs than immigration, with 63% holding that view compared to 47% in Europe.
On misinformation, responses are closely aligned. A large majority of policy experts in both regions expect an AI-driven misinformation crisis within the next one to two years—87% in the U.S. and 82% in Europe. Many also believe that AI-generated or AI-amplified misinformation could affect elections and public health information.
Some respondents frame the risks in more fundamental terms. In the United States, 41% of policy experts say AI poses an existential threat to humanity. In Europe, 29% share that view. U.S. respondents are also more likely to believe that advances in AI could harm global security and stability.
The findings come as policymakers begin to respond more actively. In the U.S., Senators Josh Hawley, Richard Blumenthal and Mark Warner have introduced bipartisan legislation focused on AI accountability, including measures aimed at protecting workers and children.
In Europe, the introduction of the EU AI Act marks a more advanced regulatory approach. The framework sets out rules based on levels of risk and is widely seen as the first comprehensive attempt to govern AI at scale.
William Stewart, President and Founder of Povaddo, said: "What makes these findings so significant is who is saying it. These are the practitioners who work inside the policy process every day, spanning every corner of the policy world from defense to healthcare to finance, not activists or everyday citizens. These findings foreshadow real action. The current path of governments accelerating AI deployment while falling short on governance is not sustainable, and the people who know that best are the ones in this survey. You cannot have nine-in-ten policy insiders demanding more regulation and four-in-ten calling AI an existential threat without that eventually moving the needle in Washington and Brussels in terms of legislative or regulatory action".
Taken together, the survey reflects a shift in how AI is being discussed within policymaking circles. Concern is no longer limited to future risks. It is increasingly tied to current gaps in governance and the pace of deployment.
Keep Reading
The hidden cost of scaling AI: infrastructure, energy, and the push for liquid cooling.
Updated
January 8, 2026 6:31 PM
The inside of a data centre, with rows of server racks. PHOTO: FREEPIK
As artificial intelligence models grow larger and more demanding, the quiet pressure point isn’t the algorithms themselves—it’s the AI infrastructure that has to run them. Training and deploying modern AI models now requires enormous amounts of computing power, which creates a different kind of challenge: heat, energy use and space inside data centers. This is the context in which Supermicro and NVIDIA’s collaboration on AI infrastructure begins to matter.
Supermicro designs and builds large-scale computing systems for data centers. It has now expanded its support for NVIDIA’s Blackwell generation of AI chips with new liquid-cooled server platforms built around the NVIDIA HGX B300. The announcement isn’t just about faster hardware. It reflects a broader effort to rethink how AI data center infrastructure is built as facilities strain under rising power and cooling demands.
At a basic level, the systems are designed to pack more AI chips into less space while using less energy to keep them running. Instead of relying mainly on air cooling—fans, chillers and large amounts of electricity, these liquid-cooled AI servers circulate liquid directly across critical components. That approach removes heat more efficiently, allowing servers to run denser AI workloads without overheating or wasting energy.
Why does that matter outside a data center? Because AI doesn’t scale in isolation. As models become more complex, the cost of running them rises quickly, not just in hardware budgets, but in electricity use, water consumption and physical footprint. Traditional air-cooling methods are increasingly becoming a bottleneck, limiting how far AI systems can grow before energy and infrastructure costs spiral.
This is where the Supermicro–NVIDIA partnership fits in. NVIDIA supplies the computing engines—the Blackwell-based GPUs designed to handle massive AI workloads. Supermicro focuses on how those chips are deployed in the real world: how many GPUs can fit in a rack, how they are cooled, how quickly systems can be assembled and how reliably they can operate at scale in modern data centers. Together, the goal is to make high-density AI computing more practical, not just more powerful.
The new liquid-cooled designs are aimed at hyperscale data centers and so-called AI factories—facilities built specifically to train and run large AI models continuously. By increasing GPU density per rack and removing most of the heat through liquid cooling, these systems aim to ease a growing tension in the AI boom: the need for more computers without an equally dramatic rise in energy waste.
Just as important is speed. Large organizations don’t want to spend months stitching together custom AI infrastructure. Supermicro’s approach packages compute, networking and cooling into pre-validated data center building blocks that can be deployed faster. In a world where AI capabilities are advancing rapidly, time to deployment can matter as much as raw performance.
Stepping back, this development says less about one product launch and more about a shift in priorities across the AI industry. The next phase of AI growth isn’t only about smarter models—it’s about whether the physical infrastructure powering AI can scale responsibly. Efficiency, power use and sustainability are becoming as critical as speed.