A rare policy consensus emerges as AI’s impact moves beyond innovation into governance and societal risk
Updated
May 5, 2026 5:42 PM
A mechanical hand reaching for the hand of flesh. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
A new survey from Povaddo, a policy research firm, suggests that concern about artificial intelligence is no longer limited to industry or academia. It is now firmly present within the policy community.
The survey draws on responses from 301 public policy professionals across the United States and Europe, including lawmakers, staffers and analysts involved in shaping and evaluating public policy. A majority of respondents—61%—say governments are falling short in addressing the negative impacts of AI.
There is also broad agreement that regulation needs to increase. In the United States, 92% of respondents support stronger AI regulation, compared to 70% in Europe. At a time when consensus is often difficult, the findings point to a shared view across policy circles that current frameworks are not keeping pace with technological development.
Differences emerge when looking at how AI is affecting national contexts. In the U.S., 57% of policy experts believe AI is already harming the labor market. In Europe, 34% say the same. U.S. respondents are also more likely to see AI as a greater threat to jobs than immigration, with 63% holding that view compared to 47% in Europe.
On misinformation, responses are closely aligned. A large majority of policy experts in both regions expect an AI-driven misinformation crisis within the next one to two years—87% in the U.S. and 82% in Europe. Many also believe that AI-generated or AI-amplified misinformation could affect elections and public health information.
Some respondents frame the risks in more fundamental terms. In the United States, 41% of policy experts say AI poses an existential threat to humanity. In Europe, 29% share that view. U.S. respondents are also more likely to believe that advances in AI could harm global security and stability.
The findings come as policymakers begin to respond more actively. In the U.S., Senators Josh Hawley, Richard Blumenthal and Mark Warner have introduced bipartisan legislation focused on AI accountability, including measures aimed at protecting workers and children.
In Europe, the introduction of the EU AI Act marks a more advanced regulatory approach. The framework sets out rules based on levels of risk and is widely seen as the first comprehensive attempt to govern AI at scale.
William Stewart, President and Founder of Povaddo, said: "What makes these findings so significant is who is saying it. These are the practitioners who work inside the policy process every day, spanning every corner of the policy world from defense to healthcare to finance, not activists or everyday citizens. These findings foreshadow real action. The current path of governments accelerating AI deployment while falling short on governance is not sustainable, and the people who know that best are the ones in this survey. You cannot have nine-in-ten policy insiders demanding more regulation and four-in-ten calling AI an existential threat without that eventually moving the needle in Washington and Brussels in terms of legislative or regulatory action".
Taken together, the survey reflects a shift in how AI is being discussed within policymaking circles. Concern is no longer limited to future risks. It is increasingly tied to current gaps in governance and the pace of deployment.
Keep Reading
Turning computing heat into a practical heating solution for greenhouses.
Updated
January 23, 2026 10:41 AM
Inside of a workstation computer with red lighting. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
Most computing systems have one unavoidable side effect: they get hot. That heat is usually treated as a problem and pushed away using cooling systems. Canaan Inc., a technology company that builds high-performance computing machines, is now showing how that same heat can be reused instead of wasted.
In a pilot project in Manitoba, Canada, Canaan is working with greenhouse operator Bitforest Investment to recover heat generated by its computing systems. Rather than focusing only on computing output, the project looks at a more basic question—what happens to all the heat these machines produce and can it serve a practical purpose?
The idea is simple. Canaan’s computers run continuously and naturally generate heat. Instead of releasing that heat into the environment, the system captures it and uses it to warm water. That warm water is then fed into the greenhouse’s existing heating system. As a result, the greenhouse needs less additional energy to maintain the temperatures required for plant growth.
This is enabled through liquid cooling. Instead of using air to cool the machines, a liquid circulates through the system and absorbs heat more efficiently. Because liquid retains heat better than air, the recovered water reaches temperatures that are suitable for industrial use. In effect, the computing system supports greenhouse heating while continuing to perform its primary computing function.
What makes this approach workable is that it integrates with existing infrastructure. The recovered heat does not replace the greenhouse’s boilers but supplements them. By preheating the water that enters the boiler system, the overall energy demand is reduced. Based on current assumptions, Canaan estimates that a significant portion of the electricity used by the servers can be recovered as usable heat, though actual results will be confirmed once the system is fully operational.
This matters because heating is one of the largest energy expenses for commercial greenhouses, particularly in colder regions like Canada. Many facilities still rely heavily on fossil-fuel-based heating and policies such as carbon pricing are encouraging lower-emission alternatives. Reusing computing heat offers a way to improve efficiency without requiring a complete overhaul of existing systems.
The project is planned to run for an initial two-year period, allowing Canaan to evaluate real-world performance factors such as reliability, system stability and maintenance needs. These findings will help determine whether the model can be replicated in other agricultural or industrial settings.
More broadly, the initiative reflects a shift in how computing infrastructure can be designed. Instead of operating as energy-intensive systems isolated from everyday use, computing equipment can contribute to real-world applications. Canaan’s greenhouse pilot highlights how excess heat—often seen as a by-product—can become part of a more efficient and thoughtful energy loop.
In doing so, the project suggests that improving sustainability in technology is not only about reducing energy consumption, but also about finding smarter ways to reuse the energy already being generated.