A rare policy consensus emerges as AI’s impact moves beyond innovation into governance and societal risk
Updated
May 5, 2026 5:42 PM
A mechanical hand reaching for the hand of flesh. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
A new survey from Povaddo, a policy research firm, suggests that concern about artificial intelligence is no longer limited to industry or academia. It is now firmly present within the policy community.
The survey draws on responses from 301 public policy professionals across the United States and Europe, including lawmakers, staffers and analysts involved in shaping and evaluating public policy. A majority of respondents—61%—say governments are falling short in addressing the negative impacts of AI.
There is also broad agreement that regulation needs to increase. In the United States, 92% of respondents support stronger AI regulation, compared to 70% in Europe. At a time when consensus is often difficult, the findings point to a shared view across policy circles that current frameworks are not keeping pace with technological development.
Differences emerge when looking at how AI is affecting national contexts. In the U.S., 57% of policy experts believe AI is already harming the labor market. In Europe, 34% say the same. U.S. respondents are also more likely to see AI as a greater threat to jobs than immigration, with 63% holding that view compared to 47% in Europe.
On misinformation, responses are closely aligned. A large majority of policy experts in both regions expect an AI-driven misinformation crisis within the next one to two years—87% in the U.S. and 82% in Europe. Many also believe that AI-generated or AI-amplified misinformation could affect elections and public health information.
Some respondents frame the risks in more fundamental terms. In the United States, 41% of policy experts say AI poses an existential threat to humanity. In Europe, 29% share that view. U.S. respondents are also more likely to believe that advances in AI could harm global security and stability.
The findings come as policymakers begin to respond more actively. In the U.S., Senators Josh Hawley, Richard Blumenthal and Mark Warner have introduced bipartisan legislation focused on AI accountability, including measures aimed at protecting workers and children.
In Europe, the introduction of the EU AI Act marks a more advanced regulatory approach. The framework sets out rules based on levels of risk and is widely seen as the first comprehensive attempt to govern AI at scale.
William Stewart, President and Founder of Povaddo, said: "What makes these findings so significant is who is saying it. These are the practitioners who work inside the policy process every day, spanning every corner of the policy world from defense to healthcare to finance, not activists or everyday citizens. These findings foreshadow real action. The current path of governments accelerating AI deployment while falling short on governance is not sustainable, and the people who know that best are the ones in this survey. You cannot have nine-in-ten policy insiders demanding more regulation and four-in-ten calling AI an existential threat without that eventually moving the needle in Washington and Brussels in terms of legislative or regulatory action".
Taken together, the survey reflects a shift in how AI is being discussed within policymaking circles. Concern is no longer limited to future risks. It is increasingly tied to current gaps in governance and the pace of deployment.
Keep Reading
AI’s expansion into the physical world is reshaping what investors choose to back
Updated
March 17, 2026 1:02 AM
Exterior view of the Exchange Square in Central, Hong Kong. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
Artificial intelligence is often discussed in terms of large models trained in distant data centres. Less visible, but increasingly consequential, is the layer of computing that enables machines to interpret and respond to the physical world in real-time. As AI systems move from abstract software into vehicles, cameras and factory equipment, the chips that power on-device decision-making are becoming strategic assets in their own right.
It is within this shift that Axera, a Shanghai-based semiconductor company, began trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on February 10 under the ticker symbol 00600.HK. The company priced its shares at HK$28.2, debuting with a market capitalization of approximately HK$16.6 billion. Its listing marks the first time a Chinese company focused primarily on AI perception and edge inference chips has gone public in the city — a milestone that underscores growing investor interest in the hardware layer of artificial intelligence.
The listing comes at a time when demand for flexible, on-device intelligence is expanding. As manufacturers, automakers and infrastructure operators integrate AI into physical systems, the need for specialized processors capable of handling visual and sensor data efficiently has grown. At the same time, China’s domestic semiconductor industry has faced increasing pressure to build local capabilities across the chip value chain. Companies such as Axera sit at the intersection of these dynamics, serving both commercial markets and broader industrial policy priorities.
For Hong Kong, the debut adds to a cohort of technology companies seeking public capital to scale hardware-intensive businesses. Unlike software firms, semiconductor designers operate in a capital-intensive environment shaped by supply chains, fabrication partnerships and rapid product cycles. Their presence on the exchange reflects a maturing investor appetite for AI infrastructure, not just consumer-facing applications.
Axera’s early backer, Qiming Venture Partners, led the company’s pre-A financing round in 2020 and continued to participate in subsequent rounds. Prior to the IPO, it held more than 6 percent of the company, making it the second-largest institutional investor. The public offering provides liquidity for early investors and new funding for a company operating in a highly competitive and technologically demanding sector.
Axera’s market debut does not resolve the competitive challenges of the semiconductor industry, where innovation cycles are short and global competition is intense. But it does signal that investors are placing tangible value on the hardware, enabling AI’s expansion beyond the cloud. In that sense, the listing represents more than a corporate milestone; it reflects a broader transition in how artificial intelligence is built, deployed and financed — moving steadily from software abstraction toward the silicon that makes real-world autonomy possible.