As airports grow more complex, the real innovation lies in making their systems simpler, faster, and easier to act on
Updated
March 24, 2026 5:55 PM
An airplane parked at Josep Tarradellas Barcelona-El Prat Airport. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
Airports are some of the most complex systems in the world. Every day, they manage thousands of flights, passengers, crew schedules, gates and ground operations—all moving at the same time. But much of this still runs on older software that doesn’t connect well, making simple decisions harder than they need to be.
This is the gap companies like AirportLabs are trying to address. Instead of relying on multiple disconnected systems, their approach brings airport operations into one cloud-based platform. The goal is straightforward: take scattered data and turn it into something teams can actually use in real time.
In practice, this means combining core systems like flight databases, resource management and display systems into a single interface. When everything is connected, airport staff can respond faster—whether it’s adjusting gate assignments, managing delays, or coordinating ground crews. Rather than reacting late, decisions can be made as situations unfold.
Another shift is how this technology is built. Traditional airport systems often require heavy on-site infrastructure and long deployment timelines. In contrast, cloud-based platforms remove much of that complexity. Updates are faster, systems are easier to scale and teams spend less time maintaining servers and more time improving operations.
What stands out is the speed of adoption. Instead of multi-year rollouts, newer systems can be implemented in weeks, allowing airports to see improvements much sooner.
At a broader level, this reflects a familiar pattern seen across industries. As operations become more data-heavy, the advantage shifts to those who can simplify complexity. In aviation, that doesn’t just mean better technology—it means making the entire system easier to run.
Keep Reading
Backed by Menlo Ventures, BrainGrid tackles planning gaps as AI makes software building accessible to more founders.
Updated
April 1, 2026 8:37 AM
A phone screen with app icons. PHOTO: UNPSLASH
As artificial intelligence makes it easier to write code, a different problem is starting to surface. Building software is no longer limited by technical skill alone. Increasingly, the challenge lies in deciding what to build, how to structure it, and how to turn an idea into something that actually works.
That shift sits at the centre of BrainGrid, a startup that has raised $1 million in pre-seed funding led by Menlo Ventures, with participation from Next Tier Ventures and Brainstorm Ventures. The company is building what it describes as an AI-powered planning layer for people who want to create software but may not have a technical background.
The timing reflects a broader change in how products are being built. Tools like Claude Code and Cursor have made it possible to generate working code through simple prompts. For many first-time founders, this has lowered the barrier to entry. But writing code is only one part of the process. Turning that code into a reliable product requires structure, sequencing and clarity—areas where many projects begin to fall apart.
In traditional teams, this responsibility sits with product managers who define what needs to be built and in what order. Without that layer, even well-written code can lead to products that feel disjointed or incomplete. Features may not work together, integrations can break and the final product often does not match the original idea.
BrainGrid is designed to address that gap. Instead of focusing on generating code, it helps users map out the structure of a product before development begins. The aim is to give builders a clearer starting point so that the tools they use—whether human or AI—can produce more consistent results.
The company says more than 500 builders have already used it to create software products across areas like fitness, healthcare and productivity. These range from first-time founders experimenting with new ideas to experienced developers working independently. In many cases, the products are already live and generating revenue, suggesting that the demand is not just for experimentation but for building something that can scale.
For investors, the appeal lies in the evolving role of software development. As AI takes on more of the technical work, the value shifts toward defining the problem and structuring the solution. In that sense, planning becomes less of a background task and more of a core capability.
The US$1 million raise is relatively modest, but it points to a larger trend. As more people gain access to AI tools, the number of potential builders expands. What remains limited is the ability to organise ideas into products that work in the real world. If that shift continues, the next wave of software may not be defined by who can code, but by who can plan.