Artificial Intelligence

How a Startup Is Using AI to Cut Space Mission Prep Cycles

A new AI model replaces months of simulation with near-instant predictions, changing how spacecraft operations are prepared

Updated

April 24, 2026 10:53 AM

Northrop Grumman Stargaze serves as the mother ship for the Pegasus, an air-launched orbital rocket. PHOTO: UNSPLASH

Flexcompute, a startup that builds software to simulate real-world physics, is working with Northrop Grumman to change how space missions are prepared. Together, they have developed an AI-based system that can predict how spacecraft respond during critical manoeuvres such as docking—when one spacecraft moves in and connects with another in orbit. These steps have traditionally taken months of preparation.

At the centre of this work is a long-standing problem in space operations. When a spacecraft fires its thrusters, the exhaust plume interacts with nearby surfaces. These interactions can affect movement, temperature and stability. Because these effects are difficult to test in real conditions, engineers have relied on large volumes of computer simulations to estimate outcomes before a mission. That process is slow and resource-intensive.

The new system replaces much of that workflow with a trained AI model. Instead of running millions of simulations, the model learns patterns from physics-based data and can make predictions in seconds. It also provides a measure of uncertainty, which helps engineers understand how reliable those predictions are when making decisions.

"At Northrop Grumman, we're pioneering physics AI to accelerate design and solve complex simulation and modelling problems like plume impingement—critical for station keeping, rendezvous and space robotics. Simply put: we're pushing the boundaries of advanced space operations", said Fahad Khan, Director of AI Foundations at Northrop Grumman. "Partnering with Flexcompute and NVIDIA, we're accelerating innovation and mission timelines to deliver superior space capabilities for customers at the speed they need".

The system is built using technology from NVIDIA, which provides the computing framework behind the model. Flexcompute has adapted it to handle the specific challenges of spaceflight, including how gases expand and interact in a vacuum. The result is a tool that can simulate complex scenarios much faster while maintaining the level of accuracy needed for mission planning.

By shortening preparation time, the model changes how engineers approach spacecraft design and operations. Faster predictions mean teams can test more scenarios and adjust plans more quickly. It also helps improve fuel use and extend the lifespan of spacecraft.

"Northrop Grumman's confidence reflects what sets Flexcompute apart", said Vera Yang, President and Co-Founder of Flexcompute. "We are able to take the most accurate and scalable physics foundations and evolve them into highly trained, customized Physics AI solutions that engineers can rely on. This work shows how we are transforming the role of simulation, not just speeding it up, but expanding what engineers can confidently solve and how quickly they can act".

The collaboration points to a broader shift in how engineering problems are being handled. Instead of relying only on detailed simulations that take time to run, companies are beginning to use AI systems that can approximate those results quickly while still reflecting the underlying physics.

"The industry's most ambitious space missions now demand a level of speed and precision that traditional engineering cycles can no longer sustain", said Tim Costa, vice president and general manager of computational engineering at NVIDIA. "By integrating NVIDIA PhysicsNeMo, Northrop Grumman and Flexcompute are transforming complex simulations like plume impingement from days of compute into seconds of insight, drastically accelerating the path from mission concept to orbit".

What emerges from this work is a shift in how missions are prepared. When prediction cycles move from months to seconds, testing and decision-making can happen faster. For space operations, where timing and precision are closely linked, that change could reshape how systems are built and run.

Keep Reading

Artificial Intelligence

What Happens When AI Writes the Wrong References?

HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.

Updated

January 8, 2026 6:33 PM

The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK

It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.

Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.

Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.

But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.

Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.

Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.

As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.

Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.

Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.