Why More Growth Companies Are Looking Beyond the Traditional IPO
.jpg)
Enhanced Games at Resorts World Las Vegas. PHOTO: FACEBOOK@ENHANCEDGAMES
Enhanced Games reached the public markets in less than six months.
In an era where traditional IPOs can take more than a year to complete, the speed of the company’s merger with A Paradise Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ: APAD) stands out, particularly given the significantly tighter regulatory scrutiny surrounding SPAC transactions since 2021.
The transaction highlights why some growth-stage companies are evaluating special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) as a viable alternative to the traditional IPO process.
Led by Dr. Aron D’Souza and backed by investors including Peter Thiel and Christian Angermayer, Enhanced Games announced its Business Combination Agreement with APAD in November 2025. The transaction closed in May 2026, bringing the company to the public markets materially faster than the timeline typically associated with a conventional IPO.
For decades, the traditional IPO has been considered the default route for private companies entering the public markets. But for many high-growth businesses today, the process has become increasingly slow, expensive, and difficult to execute efficiently.
A conventional IPO can take well over a year to prepare, involving extensive audits, regulatory reviews, underwriter coordination, investor roadshows, and careful timing against market conditions. During that period, companies remain exposed to volatility, shifting investor sentiment, and delayed access to capital. According to EY, many companies postponed planned IPOs amid market volatility and uncertainty surrounding U.S. tariff announcements, highlighting how sensitive IPO execution can be to broader market conditions.
For businesses operating in fast-moving industries, timing matters. Delayed access to liquidity can slow expansion, hiring, acquisitions, partnerships, and product development at critical stages of growth.
That is one reason why the merger between Enhanced Games and APAD is notable. The SPAC structure allowed Enhanced Games to negotiate valuation, governance terms, and financing arrangements early in the process, compressing many of the steps normally associated with a conventional IPO into a single transaction.
Enhanced Games operates across sports, media, performance science, and wellness, sectors that require significant upfront investment and rapid execution. Earlier access to public capital provided the company with liquidity, visibility, and strategic flexibility at an important stage of growth.
The public listing also gives the company tradable equity that can potentially support acquisitions, partnerships, athlete compensation structures, sponsorship arrangements, and future fundraising initiatives. These capabilities are particularly relevant in industries evolving as rapidly as sports entertainment, wellness, and human-performance science, where speed itself can become a competitive advantage.
The deal also highlights one of the SPAC market’s core advantages: the ability to combine capital raising and public-market entry within a single process.
Beyond speed, the SPAC structure offered Enhanced Games another major advantage: earlier visibility into valuation.
In a traditional IPO, pricing is largely determined near the end of the process through institutional book-building and investor demand during the roadshow phase. Even late-stage IPO candidates can face valuation cuts, downsized offerings, or postponed listings if market conditions weaken.
Recent IPO markets have repeatedly demonstrated this risk. Instacart went public in 2023 at an approximate US$9.9 billion valuation, which is dramatically below the US$39 billion private valuation it achieved during the 2021 market peak. Similarly, WeWork’s failed IPO attempt became one of the clearest examples of how rapidly investor sentiment can shift during the IPO process.
SPAC mergers operate differently.
Enhanced Games secured an implied enterprise valuation of approximately US$1.2 billion months before closing the transaction. While the merger still required SEC review and shareholder approval, the company gained significantly greater visibility into deal economics much earlier in the process.
That certainty is particularly valuable for growth companies whose valuations are tied more closely to long-term platform potential than near-term profitability.
Rather than relying entirely on shifting IPO market sentiment, the SPAC structure allowed Enhanced Games to negotiate around its broader growth strategy and future expansion plans from the outset.
The Enhanced Games transaction also reinforces why some growth-stage companies evaluate SPACs as an alternative to the traditional IPO process.
Traditional IPO investors often prefer businesses with long operating histories, stable earnings, and predictable growth profiles. Many expansion-stage companies simply do not fit that model yet, even if their long-term opportunities are substantial.
SPACs offer a different pathway.
Instead of waiting years to achieve the operational maturity typically expected in a conventional IPO, companies can access public-market capital earlier while still in growth mode.
For Enhanced Games, early access to the public markets provides more than capital. Public equity can support acquisitions, partnerships, athlete compensation structures, sponsorship arrangements, and future fundraising efforts. These capabilities are particularly important in sectors evolving as rapidly as sports entertainment, wellness, and human-performance science, where speed itself can become a competitive advantage.
The transaction also highlights how the SPAC market has evolved since the speculative boom of 2020 and 2021.
Today’s de-SPAC environment operates under significantly tighter regulatory scrutiny, including enhanced disclosure requirements, greater SEC oversight, and stricter treatment of projections and liability standards.
The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance noted that redemption rates spiked in 2022, in some cases approaching 100%, contributing to a significant slowdown of the SPAC activity.
In response to rising investor concerns and regulatory pressure, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted enhanced SPAC disclosure and liability rules in 2024 designed to align de-SPAC transactions more closely with traditional IPO standards. Sponsors also faced greater pressure to demonstrate financing certainty, stronger disclosures, and more credible post-merger execution.
Enhanced Games completed its transaction within this more disciplined environment.
Its Form S-4 included audited financial statements, governance disclosures, transaction details, and extensive risk-factor analysis subject to SEC review. The company also supplemented SPAC trust proceeds with a separately arranged US$40 million PIPE financing commitment designed to strengthen liquidity and improve deal certainty.
That structure reflects a more institutional and disciplined SPAC market than the speculative wave seen several years ago.
The Enhanced Games transaction demonstrates that, despite tighter regulation and a far more selective market environment, SPACs can offer certain growth companies a practical alternative to the traditional IPO.
For businesses prioritising speed, capital access, and execution certainty, a well-structured de-SPAC transaction may provide a more efficient route to the public markets, particularly when supported by credible financing, disciplined structuring, and strong investor backing.
Keep Reading
Huawei is betting that the future of AI infrastructure will depend as much on energy systems as on computing power
Updated
May 19, 2026 5:43 PM
Blue light painting with a lightbulb. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
As AI companies build larger models and deploy more AI agents, the industry is running into a new constraint: electricity. The challenge is no longer just about computing power. It is increasingly about how to supply, manage and sustain the energy needed to run AI infrastructure at scale.
That was the central argument behind Huawei’s latest AI data center strategy unveiled at its Global AIDC Industry Summit in Dongguan.
The company introduced what it calls a grid-interactive AIDC strategy, focused on redesigning AI data centers around power supply, cooling systems and energy management. AIDC refers to AI data centers built specifically for large-scale AI computing workloads.
The announcement reflects a broader shift happening across the industry. As AI systems grow larger, data centers are consuming more electricity and generating more heat than traditional computing infrastructure was designed to handle. Companies are now being forced to rethink not just chips and servers, but the physical systems supporting them.
Huawei argues that future AI infrastructure will need closer coordination between computing systems and energy grids. The company says traditional data center designs are struggling to keep up with fluctuating AI workloads, rising power density and the growing use of renewable energy sources.
Hou Jinlong, Director of the Board of Huawei and President of Huawei Digital Power, said: "The booming AI industry, widely adopted large models, and numerous AI agents are creating huge energy demands, set to boost the global AIDC capacity. Electricity is essential for computing; energy is the foundation for AI long-term development. Computing and electricity will deeply synergize and empower each other, progressively building an integrated framework that brings together new power systems and AI infrastructure."
A large part of Huawei’s strategy focuses on power architecture. AI workloads can create sudden spikes in electricity demand, especially in high-density computing environments. To manage that, Huawei says it plans to develop new power systems that combine grid-friendly UPS infrastructure with energy storage technologies.
Cooling is becoming another major pressure point. AI servers generate significantly more heat than traditional enterprise systems and Huawei says liquid cooling is now becoming essential for large-scale AI deployments. The company introduced a liquid cooling system designed to improve long-term thermal management inside high-density AI environments.
Huawei is also pushing modular construction methods to reduce deployment times for AI data centers. Instead of building infrastructure entirely onsite, parts of the system can be prefabricated and tested in factories before installation.
Bob He, Vice President of Huawei Digital Power, said: "The global AI industry is booming, and the token demand surges. As such, the AIDC industry is entering the Token era."
As part of that shift, Huawei introduced a proposed measurement system called the TokEnergy Index. The company says the metric is designed to measure the relationship between energy consumption and AI computing output, rather than relying only on traditional data center efficiency metrics such as PUE.
The broader message behind the strategy is that AI infrastructure is becoming an energy engineering problem as much as a computing problem. As global demand for AI continues to rise, companies across the sector are beginning to realise that the future of AI may depend not only on better models, but also on whether power grids and data centers can keep up with them.