How ChinaMarket uses digital tools to make cross-border sourcing faster and more accessible for smaller businesses
A rack of colourful scarves. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
The 5th RCEP (Shandong) Import Commodities Expo opened this week at the Linyi International Expo Center, bringing together more than 5,300 buyers and over 400 exhibitors from 48 countries. Alongside the scale of the event, a quieter shift was visible in how trade itself is being organised.
ChinaMarket, the official platform of Linyi Mall, used the expo to show how sourcing is moving from manual coordination to software-led systems. On the first day, it hosted procurement matchmaking sessions and signed agreements with buyer groups from Argentina, South Korea and Ghana. But the focus was less on the deals themselves and more on the mechanism behind them.
The platform operates as a structured network of verified manufacturers, grouped by industrial clusters. Instead of buyers searching supplier by supplier, the system uses data and AI tools to match demand with production capacity. At the expo, this process was made visible through real-time data screens and guided sourcing sessions, where procurement teams connected directly with factories across categories such as building materials, textiles and electronics.
"Sourcing suppliers separately was time-consuming and inefficient. ChinaMarket accurately matches our needs and recommends reliable factories, saving us considerable effort," commented an Argentine buyer.
The underlying problem being addressed is not new. Cross-border sourcing is often slow, fragmented and dependent on intermediaries. What is changing is how that process is being compressed. By combining supplier verification, demand matching and communication into a single system, platforms like ChinaMarket aim to shorten sourcing cycles. They also reduce uncertainty in procurement decisions.
Financing is another layer where the model is evolving. Even when suppliers and buyers are matched efficiently, access to capital can still slow transactions down. Small and medium-sized firms often face constraints around payment terms and access to credit in international trade.
ChinaMarket’s “data + order financing” model links transaction data with financial services, allowing funding decisions to be tied more directly to verified orders rather than external collateral. In practice, this shifts part of the risk assessment from institutions to platform-level data.
The company is also extending this structure into agricultural supply chains. At the expo, it signed an agreement with a local government in Yinan County to build a digitally managed agricultural belt. The model combines sourcing at origin with platform distribution, with an emphasis on traceability for buyers across RCEP markets. This reflects a broader attempt to standardise supply visibility in sectors that are typically less digitised.
Geographically, the platform has been expanding into Southeast Asia. It has launched a digital marketplace in Malaysia and established operations in Indonesia, including support for government-linked procurement projects. These moves suggest a focus on embedding the platform within regional trade flows rather than operating as a standalone marketplace.
"We aim to be a 'super connector' between Chinese industrial belts and global markets", said Quan Chuanxiao, Chairman of Depth Digital Technology Group and ChinaMarket. "By digitizing the cross-border trade process, we solve trust and efficiency issues, making it simpler, faster, and more reliable for overseas buyers to source from China".
What emerges from the expo is less about a single platform and more about a shift in infrastructure. Trade is gradually moving toward systems where discovery, verification, negotiation and financing are handled within integrated digital layers. The question is not whether sourcing can be digitised, but how reliably these systems can scale across industries where trust and execution still depend on physical outcomes.
Keep Reading
Backed by Menlo Ventures, BrainGrid tackles planning gaps as AI makes software building accessible to more founders.
Updated
April 20, 2026 1:40 PM
A phone screen with app icons. PHOTO: UNPSLASH
As artificial intelligence makes it easier to write code, a different problem is starting to surface. Building software is no longer limited by technical skill alone. Increasingly, the challenge lies in deciding what to build, how to structure it, and how to turn an idea into something that actually works.
That shift sits at the centre of BrainGrid, a startup that has raised $1 million in pre-seed funding led by Menlo Ventures, with participation from Next Tier Ventures and Brainstorm Ventures. The company is building what it describes as an AI-powered planning layer for people who want to create software but may not have a technical background.
The timing reflects a broader change in how products are being built. Tools like Claude Code and Cursor have made it possible to generate working code through simple prompts. For many first-time founders, this has lowered the barrier to entry. But writing code is only one part of the process. Turning that code into a reliable product requires structure, sequencing and clarity—areas where many projects begin to fall apart.
In traditional teams, this responsibility sits with product managers who define what needs to be built and in what order. Without that layer, even well-written code can lead to products that feel disjointed or incomplete. Features may not work together, integrations can break and the final product often does not match the original idea.
BrainGrid is designed to address that gap. Instead of focusing on generating code, it helps users map out the structure of a product before development begins. The aim is to give builders a clearer starting point so that the tools they use—whether human or AI—can produce more consistent results.
The company says more than 500 builders have already used it to create software products across areas like fitness, healthcare and productivity. These range from first-time founders experimenting with new ideas to experienced developers working independently. In many cases, the products are already live and generating revenue, suggesting that the demand is not just for experimentation but for building something that can scale.
For investors, the appeal lies in the evolving role of software development. As AI takes on more of the technical work, the value shifts toward defining the problem and structuring the solution. In that sense, planning becomes less of a background task and more of a core capability.
The US$1 million raise is relatively modest, but it points to a larger trend. As more people gain access to AI tools, the number of potential builders expands. What remains limited is the ability to organise ideas into products that work in the real world. If that shift continues, the next wave of software may not be defined by who can code, but by who can plan.